In Leviticus, God clearly bans SHELLFISH!
And yet our heathen culture partakes in tis sinful food!
We must protect the SANTITY of JEWSUS and STRATE marriage!
am i right, or am i right?
2006-06-18 02:08:58 · 26 answers · asked by Lil OL REBORN 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
If Pat Robertson if for it, I'm against it.
If Pat Robertson is against it, I'm for it.
Anyone want to share an Ultimate Fondue?
2006-06-18 03:10:46 · answer #1 · answered by Mama Pastafarian 7 · 6⤊ 6⤋
That is only one reason the reason now is because there are people that are dying in Honduras from scuba diving for them. They are paid so much per lobster and with them being a 3rd world country they dive more and deeper than they should and they are dying, while the "fisherman" are making big bucks off them. I am sure that there are other restaurants that us the lobster from Honduras but I do know that Red Lobster does. So YES protest and do NOT eat at Red Lobster.
2006-06-18 02:15:23 · answer #2 · answered by ocean1moon 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, not hardly. Eating shellfish, and pork has nothing to do with salvation, and heaven. On the other hand, you seem to be under the influence of some sort of intoxicant, which the bible speaks clearly against. Why? Because you were too impared to use Spell Check!
2006-06-18 02:18:38 · answer #3 · answered by Battlerattle06 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, Christians are fond of saying how evil homosexuality is, because it's in the OT laws, but they eat shellfish and pork, which are also condemned in OT laws--as is the wearing of mixed-fiber clothing! They simply pick the things from the Bible that they like and ignore the rest, then tell us that WE have to accept the entire Bible as "God's word." Why should we accept it if they don't??
2006-06-18 02:35:02 · answer #4 · answered by Antique Silver Buttons 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Us born again christians tend to go by the new testement. So I would say there is no need to protest other then they boil those little guys alive. As for straight marriage I'm right ther with ya. Yes, it needs to protected and kept holy.
2006-06-18 02:13:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well i guess I will be sinning today, because I'll be boiling and eating shrimp and crabs and to hell with Leviticus, he just did not know how to cook these good shellfish
But yes we should protest Red Lobster, not for the reason you stated, but because they to like Leviticus can not cook
and you are right
2006-06-18 02:22:22 · answer #6 · answered by man of ape 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Right wing or right off the pages?
We should protest them anyway for being Red, which is a symbol of godless communism.
If they became red,white and blue lobster, that's OK
2006-06-18 02:12:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did God ban it or the writer of Leviticus?
2006-06-18 02:13:42 · answer #8 · answered by Mr.Wise 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not only shellfish, Mr Robertson (said respectfully) it's pork, turtle and alot of other foods.
Glad to see you on today!
2006-06-18 02:18:14 · answer #9 · answered by Punky 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, you're not right. There are cultures other than yours that enjoy seafood. It's closed minded thinking like this that cause religious wars and strife.
2006-06-18 02:15:35 · answer #10 · answered by Stew 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The easy thing to do is to simply avoid restaurants that have unclean food such as lobsters.
2006-06-18 02:12:29 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋