If evolution is true, how can it contradict the laws of thermodynamics?

Question

The first law of thermodynamics states that nothing can be created or destroyed. Then how could something be created out of nothing (big bag theory) instead of something being created out of something (God)?

The second law of thermodynamics states that disorder will always increase. So how could more order come from less order how evolution tries to prove?

Answer 1

Well, one of the typical contention that Christians have with evolution is the one you stated above. There is, however, a counterargument to this. Evolutionists would counter that, as long as disorder increases (Which would be delta S, or change in entropy) in the entire universe instead of just one part of the universe, entropy is not violated. So, though entropy may have decreased on Earth in the process of evolution, in the entire universe, entropy and disorder are still increasing, so the law would, technically, not be violated.
As for the Big Bang Theory, it's still being explored. Physicists don't quite understand the Big Bang. I think the theory involves some stuff about singularities and whatever, and that, at the beginning of the universe before it exploded, there were two types of particles: matter and antimatter. Since there was more matter than antimatter at the beginning of the universe, we are all made of matter. It's said that the theory still has to be worked out.

I don't believe in evolution, though, and I'm not quite sure about the Big Bang. I'm a Christian.

Answer 2

The big bang itself is beyond any physics that we know, first law of thermodynamics included. I find argument from incredulity singularly unsuitable regarding the origin of the universe, as any creation, whether by God, Flying Spaghetti Monster, or natural causes is equally impossible to get one's head around. As is, for that matter, the alternative hypothesis that the universe has always existed.

As for the second law of thermodynamics and evolution, this is a gross and possibly deliberate misunderstanding of the second law of thermodynamics. If the second law required that everything at all times is becoming more disordered, reproduction itself would be impossible, and the world would simply be full of death and decay.

Answer 3

If you knew your big bang theory correctly you would know that the matter was there all along. The big bang is the beginning of time - time split from space.
as for second law of thermodynamics- wikipedia says-
When one part of an isolated system interacts with another part, energy tends to distribute equally among the accessible energy states of the system. As a result, the system tends to approach thermal equilibrium, at which point the entropy is at a maximum and the free energy is zero. - so the second law of thermodynamics has nothing to do with evolution.

Answer 4

I don't pretend to fully understand thermo, but the idea of increasing order is supposed to be that we are in a temporary positive fluctuation.

Suppose that you drop a rock into water. Water splashes up. That is going against gravity, and from the point of view of bacteria in the water, it seems that things fall up, because everything in their environment falls up. We realize that the water will drop back down in a moment, but the bacteria do not.

Supposedly, the Big Bang was such a big rock dropped in the water, so to speak, that the splash it caused won't die down for bazillions of years.

I don't necessarily agree with this, but that is what they are saying. Personally, I think that evolution had to be possible in the universe that God made, but that the universe would not have lasted long enough for living things to spring into existence due to random collisions of atoms. God had to intervene directly to make it happen.

De-evolution, by which I mean genetic breakdown and the death of species, takes place all the time-- not because of thermodynamics, but because this is a sinful, fallen world. I believe that since the time of the Fall, there have been many examples of harmful evolution, such as bacteria mutating to become disease causing bacteria, animals mutating to become predators, men degenerating to become less-- not more-- intelligent.

Sometimes I think that satan tried to imitate God by making viruses, to attack and infiltrate cells. I can't prove it, but it stands to reason that there could not have been phage-type (cell-invading) viruses before there were cells.

In any event, the universe is not a closed system as demanded by classical thermodynamics. It remains open to reordering by both God and, to a much lesser extent, by man.

For more on this and related topics, see the works of Francis Schaeffer.

Answer 5

OMG here we go again
1) The big bang involved physics that we don't understand well yet. We don't know why inflation happened, we don't know how matter acts when so dense (like in a black hole) That just means we have mroe to learn, not that it's false.

2) Every time a snowflake is created or an icicle, or a crystal of any kind, order comes from chaos. That only applies to a CLOSED system with no new energy. The earth is constantly receiving energy from the sun which allows larger scale "opposition" to entropy.

Answer 6

the tremendous Bang theory has no longer some thing to do with the theories of evolution (they're a culmination of numerous) so that you're trying to judge apples and toasters. besides, the tremendous bang theory does no longer state or recommend that the universe got here from "no longer some thing". It states that the fabrics had to create the universe replaced into targeted in extremely-dense keep in mind that at one element "exploded" ensuing in our universe. in reality, the "theory" of wise layout does recommend that the universe arose out of no longer some thing and would very a lot violate the first regulation. the 2d regulation states the entropy (affliction) of an remoted or closed gadget will improve with time. The gadget in question could be closed for the idea to coach. a straight forward celebration i have study illustrates how air stress will right now equalize in case you've been to pop a balloon in an air tight vessel and would stay equivalent barring any outside impression. At that element, the degree of entropy in the closed gadget has reached it really is totally last degree and could bypass no better. residing creatures are not any more remoted or closed platforms. they're going to always take up power from outside of themselves (air, nutrition, water, solar as power). the 2d regulation does no longer nix evolution as our technique of being because it would not prepare to a gadget which couldn't closed. desire this facilitates :)

Answer 7

what are these laws???

this is first law
The increase in the energy of a system is equal to the amount of energy added by heating the system, minus the amount lost as a result of the work done by the system on its surroundings.


this is second law
There is no process that, operating in cycle, produces no other effect than the subtraction of a positive amount of heat from a reservoir and the production of an equal amount of work.

Answer 8

Instead of questioning evolution maybe you should question the first law of thermodynamics..... :-P

Answer 9

First off, you mention evolution, then talk about the origin of the universe. You do realize that those are seperate things, dont' you?

Answer 10

Which smoothly sums up the implausibility of the big bang theory...