2006-06-17 14:45:51 · 19 answers · asked by quinn r 1 in Environment
he'd chuck as much wood as a wood chuck should, if a wood chuck could chuck wood
2006-06-17 14:52:40 · answer #1 · answered by dreamer 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The name woodchuck has nothing etymologically to do with wood. It stems from an Algonquian name for the animal (possibly Narragansett), wuchak. The apparent relationship between the two words has led to the common tongue twister, "How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? — A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood."
2006-06-18 18:08:00 · answer #2 · answered by Professor Armitage 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If a wood chuck could chuck wood then he would have a whole lot of wood chucked, lol
2006-06-17 21:48:40 · answer #3 · answered by sapphire_1993 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It really depends on the wood chuck, because if i was a wood chuck, i would chuck wood, but i am too lazy of a wood chuck :\
I am guessing a branch...lol
2006-06-20 23:05:54 · answer #4 · answered by Max 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a wood chuck would chuck as much wood as a wood chuck could if a wood chuck could chuck wood
2006-06-17 21:49:30 · answer #5 · answered by nursegirljay 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If he chucked all day, he'd probably chuck the whole tree down. It would proceed to fall on his head leaving his intricals spread across the ground, laying there hopelessly, waiting for the other woodchucks to make the same mistake.
2006-06-17 21:49:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
a wood chuck would never chuck wood, chucking wood is not important for it to survive.
2006-06-17 21:49:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
a wood chuck would chuck all the wood he could chuck if a wood chuck had a bazooka...
2006-06-17 21:47:05 · answer #8 · answered by ggroess 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The correct answer is 3.
2006-06-17 21:50:22 · answer #9 · answered by Solo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on the weather
2006-06-17 21:50:11 · answer #10 · answered by lyjana 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋