We are citizens of the world, the whole world should be united and there should be no barriers, that would be the ideal thing. But the human being is so greedy that those rich countries dont want to share what they have with the poor ones. because their supremacy could be in danger, if wealth would be balanced on earth there will be no reason for inmigration, but as long as there are a few countries with most of the wealth in the world of course theres gonna be inmigration to those countries, that is logical
2006-06-17 10:06:41 · 25 answers · asked by Jordan 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Sorry I don't want my country to be like yours. You go and make your country like ours and then open your borders to everyone else....I'm guessing if you ever succeeded you wouldn't be so quick to open up.
By the way....why don't you get an open border agreement with China. My guess is they have 10 to 50 million people they wouldn't mind sending your way.
2006-06-17 10:09:52 · answer #1 · answered by netjr 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Many other cultures would not only disagree with you, but would, and do see the idea as a weakness to be exploited. Much of the worlds Non-Western cultures function in a dog -eat dog fashion. The US would be swallowed up and dismantled economically. Many third world countries remain poor, oppressed and in disarray because they are morally primitive, (not racially, not biologically, etc.) To merely redistribute wealth would be to waste it. So many areas of the world are in terrible shape because of wasting resources they have, and internal genocide are full time occupations for much of the population.
This does not excuse the greed that can be found in this country, But we are a rich and powerful nation because of the hard work of industrious individuals who make the best attempt on the planet to get along in order to prosper.
2006-06-17 18:32:31 · answer #2 · answered by electricpole 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you my friend are living in a fantasy utopia and the rest of the world is not ready for that tell me do you have a fence on your property and why? if no do you have locks on your home, and why ? and sure there should be immigration just legal immigration, and did you know that mexico is not a poor country and that it has enough resources to take care of their own but because of corruption they choose not too and why should we pay the tab for their corruption ? and if no one stands up to mexico and says no more will not this corruption grow stronger? when will it end ? in the future when people must die to stop it ? no i think we should send them home and say because we said so and mexico should be brought up on charges for doing this to their people and us! how do you feel about security cameras every where you go in stores in the streets its sad but it is the world we live in and we cant go back people abuse everything so their is need for it and i am certain there is need for a border . there is nothing wrong with sharing but being ran over and abused is something different . you cant take in millions of legals and millions of illegals and us and expect no economic , social , population ramifications ! now that's logical
2006-06-17 17:39:08 · answer #3 · answered by hayleylov 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would be nice but its not possible. Not yet anyway. We have to deal with reality, and that means one country's people should not be allowed to endlessly exploit the people of another country. If you really feel that way why don't you invite some homeless people to move in with you? It's not really right to own a house and put up boundaries to keep out the poor is it?
2006-06-17 17:14:24 · answer #4 · answered by DJ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We don't want to pay for to educate and give health care for another country's poor people in amounts above what we ourselves decide to give. To take services illegally is stealing. Enforcing laws against thieves is only common sense.
We built our wealth. Why can't they go back home and do the same thing there? We didn't start with any raw materials they don't have.
2006-06-17 20:22:04 · answer #5 · answered by DAR 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it will be a good idea, even the US was gonna be divided in south and north one day. But like you say there are many interests of many people and some people dont want third world countries to improve because it will be bad for the country that dominates them. indirectly, but its a domination.
2006-06-17 17:16:17 · answer #6 · answered by jrod 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Problem is, the borders have been established by countries hundreds of years ago. Do you think that any country would willngly give up their land? Plus, you must consider the differences of beliefs. If we all lived together without borders, we would kill each other for belief, property, etc.
2006-06-17 17:12:11 · answer #7 · answered by 2-3,2-4,4-3,4-4,3-4,4-2,5-4 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think your parents probably smoked marijuana before they had you, and then after you were born talked about peace and love. The hippy movement is over and done with. October 6, 1967 the Diggers held the death of the hippie parade. Janis Joplin died. It's over. There are borders, for good reason. Good fences make good neighbors.
2006-06-17 17:18:03 · answer #8 · answered by oklatom 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If u unite the whole world, OK. But who will be president? What kind of government?
If u open borders, that's doom, countries will send criminals to neighbor countries and everyone will die.
2006-06-17 17:15:23 · answer #9 · answered by dummyhead3 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can be a world citizen all you want, but the part where you're trying to get money out of the american taxpayer isn't going to work anymore...
2006-06-17 19:03:24 · answer #10 · answered by gokart121 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋