Drinking in moderation won't hurt you, they say it might even be good for you. Yet any amount of nicotine will hurt your lungs over time.
2006-06-17 09:58:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by nadia4u20 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Excellent question.It seems like every other commercial is about some form of alcohol. Never really got into it,don't care for the taste. I can't stand cigarettes either. I guess it's like a friend of mine said,the country's full of hypocrites and the media contains the most!
2016-09-19 10:58:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by mark 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Smoking kills you slowly and can make those around you sick as well. Alcohol does not usually directly kill you, though it does often kill others. IE drunk drivers. I think the problem is that the tobacco companies spend so much money advertising and trying to convince people that the bad claims are false. Alcohol is not over advertised and there is no denial by the sellers as to the effects of alcohol. I would also have to say there is much more animosity between smokers and no smokers than there is between drinkers and non drinkers.
2016-05-19 23:09:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good question. Both are dangerous to not only the people that does the drinking or smoking but its also bad or could be bad to those around them. Someone should start making more anti drunk driving ads.
2006-06-19 10:06:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by BigK1118 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am only answering this because I need 2 points to get to level 2. Much of the shouting about smoking is about smoking in the general public and at work. Drinking is already restricted to certain areas (bars, restaurants, home, etc.) and the anti-smokers are trying to use the same anal methods to restrict smoking.
2006-06-17 09:58:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Stew 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because the states sued the tobacco industry and got gobs of billions of dollars and the settlement required each state to use the money to run anti smoking campaigns
2006-06-17 10:31:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by chrome_rider 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You got a petition? I'll sign it. Alcohol kills a lot more people through "second hand action" than second hand smoke. At least I can smoke and drive a car, operate dangerous machinery and not kill some innocent person, and I don't puke on my shoes! or anyone elses shoes for that matter!
2006-06-17 09:59:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by pickle head 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because no one has sued the alcohol industry like they have the tobacco industry. The only reason all those commercials by tobacco companies are on is because of judgements made forcing them to make them.
2006-06-17 09:55:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by teachingazteca 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
There used to be no alcohol commercials on T.V.. Then someone (who knows) decided it would be o.k., as long as there were some sort of warning..example: "Drink Responsibly" (in little itty-bitty letters at the bottom of the screen.
2006-06-17 10:00:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The liquor industry is strong in america & in congress. Not as strong as it once was, DUI laws were passed! Tobacco was once strong too but it ain't no more! In congress it ain't what you know it's 'who you know,' and who you take out for a drink friday night! Always been this way & prolly always will be!
http://www.total-knowledge.com/~willyblues/
2006-06-17 10:04:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋