The philosophy of science seeks to understand nature, justify the reality of our knowledge, and explore ethical implications. Essentially, science seeks to explore the natural world around us and add to our knowledge of the universe.
Science deals only with the reality we can perceive and access - not God or any supernatural forces. Therefore, science can be summed up as the study of natural forces.
2006-06-17 10:12:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Niebla 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Do you mean true science or what science has become? There is a difference you know. What tends to corrupt pure science is money. Scientists have to eat too, just like the rest of us. Scientific research is funded, and scientists are vulnerable to those forces that provide funding, usually the
government. So...if the government has an hidden motive, and needs scientific data to make its political point, guess what? They will find a scientist somewhere, anywhere, who is willing to find data, somewhere, somehow, whether truthful or false, to back up the view of the cash cow.
Global warming is the perfect example of that. Pure junk science. And motivated for pure political reasons, all going back to, you guessed it. Money. Poorer nations want to leverage the USA to take measures to hurt itself, to weaken itself, while they have no such restrictions. The claim the USA is the major polluter, and they are innocent bystanders. They use the junk science of global warming to punish the usa, and to ignor their own global polution. China and Japan dont polute? Thats stupid.
Global warming, sure there is. There always have been changing temperatures, its called climate changes. The world cools, and we go into iceages, and it warms again, in cycles. Its natural.
Nature is pure science, not the science we have today.
2006-06-17 17:03:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by jack f 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Science is the search for the truth and nature is the world around us that happens on it's own.
2006-06-17 16:52:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nature is what we see, science attempts to explain what we see- it fails often. Believe what you see in nature-don't always believe what some scientist says to explain it. Look at the track record-its pretty bad in the evolution area. But don't listen to me -CHECK IT OUT for yourself.
2006-06-17 16:53:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nature is the experience, science is the explanation.
2006-06-17 16:53:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Science feels the need to explain.
Nature fills the needs without explaining.
2006-06-17 17:02:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Arf Bee 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nature consists of the planet Earth itself and its components-trees, grass, oceans, and the millions of species of life forms that inhabit it.. Science is the observation and study of that natural world
2006-06-17 16:56:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Margaret G 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Science is the study of...whatever
Nature Is.
2006-06-17 16:50:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by not at home 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Science" means they gave the defination and formula of particular rule of nature.
While the "Nature" is their BEYOND THE IMMEGINATION.
Thanks.
2006-06-17 17:06:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by sam 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
science is our attempt to explain nature in a way we are
capable of understanding. when our understanding
expands is when you see a previously held scientific
'fact' proven wrong.
2006-06-17 17:02:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by agedlioness 5
·
0⤊
0⤋