Question inspired by badkarma
2006-06-17 01:53:42 · 35 answers · asked by MojoMan 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Jokes & Riddles
If your neighbor is attractive and female, send 'em to me, and I'll be the judge of how wrong it is.
Oh, yeah, I'll judge it... Yeah, I'm thinking about judging it right now. Ooooh, that's some good judging!
Whoops, is this thing still on? I'll get back to you later.
2006-06-18 23:09:51 · answer #1 · answered by Dave 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
right this is no longer legal suggestion AND would not supply upward push TO ANY form of lawyer-customer relationship. in step with how long they have had their docks for, they might technically "very own" that ingredient of the valuables below the belief of inauspicious possession. if it is the case, it is not yours because of the fact the previous proprietor lost identify and can't now revive identify by utilising merchandising the valuables to you. This easily relies upon on the dimensions of their unfavorable possession and another components that your lawyer can clarify to you. on account which you're buying a house, you're able to already be represented by utilising advice. Ask him how proper to proceed. in the journey that your acquaintances do no longer meet all the standards for unfavorable possession, you're able to desire to take some sort of affirmative step to interrupt their possession- no trespass signs and warning signs are a solid initiate. no count if it continues to be your living house, you'll be answerable for injuries sustained. it is advisable to attempt mitigating any means damages by utilising putting up signs and warning signs approximately swimming at your individual threat, and so on. whilst it includes the docks themselves, there is yet another situation. you don't be attentive to how properly they have been built, so which you have a legal accountability concern there if somebody is injured on the dock- incredibly pondering you're conscious of their presence and use. i might strongly recommend which you confer with a lawyer approximately this. some money now can shop you lots greater in a while...
2016-12-08 21:58:12 · answer #2 · answered by zabel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think its such a nice thing if she found out she would be mad...not only mad but also embarassed...I would be too. Let the chick have her privacy...We all kno you like her...but leave her the h*ll alone! She just likes to sunbathe...What of it?!?! Its not cool to post the pics to a blog and its also not cool to be taking pics or spying her tho you think she is a SEXY beast!!!
2006-06-17 01:58:05 · answer #3 · answered by ♥mcmanda♥ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a great question...
The real answer is YES it sure is wrong....
But depending upon if your neighbor is FEMALE, and HOT looking... HEY! You've got to keep interesting material in your BLOGS, right?
2006-06-17 01:58:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, that could get you arrested for being some sort of peeping tom, or a version of trespassing. If this person wanted to she could sue you. So are the pictures up yet??
2006-06-17 02:00:59 · answer #5 · answered by Alice Chaos 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's okay if your neighbours has great bodies especially their teen daughter. Make sure you send a copy to the White House.
2006-06-17 01:59:47 · answer #6 · answered by nick ramsey 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uh, yeah! Unless you have permission. Although, it may seem your neighbor doesn't care who sees his/her body, he/she would have an open/shut civil law suit against offender. In addition, most cities, counties, states have laws against this. Offender could wind up in jail if neighbor finds out.
2006-06-17 03:58:29 · answer #7 · answered by Rusty 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as your neighbor is not some 500 pound guy.
2006-06-17 03:26:35 · answer #8 · answered by Laura 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, you take it easy, it doesn't wrong with karma,
If a person know what she is doing, so she may not be cared about ashamed, so you just feel free, you're not wrong
2006-06-17 01:58:30 · answer #9 · answered by Dark Angel 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that is called a peeping tom and you sound like a pervert.
2006-06-17 01:56:56 · answer #10 · answered by danni 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋