Why Aryan Invasion theory?

Question

,this ugly vestige of British imperialism is still taught in Indian schools today!while we have tremendous amount of evidence,that the Aryans were the original inhabitants of the Indus Valley region, and not a horde of marauding foreign nomads. Such an Invasion never occurred.

Answer 1

Yes It has been proved aryan Invasion never happened.


"and in all the archaeological findings there is not one shred of evidence to support the theory that these Aryans ever existed,And how come this glorious invasion left no proof of its existence when substantial proof of the civilization they supposedly conquered exists. If there were battles, there is no proof of it, and if skeletal remains were found not one of them was of a foreign race. No signs of battle, no signs of conquest and absolutely no genetic trace of these ‘foreign invaders’.The Aryan Invasion theory (AIT) was propagated by the west to justify their own purposes"
http://www.boloji.com/history/019.htm

But British Imperialism is a fact,so whats wrong in it being taught in Indian schools..Bristishers did rule India for some time,its all part of Indian History.

Answer 2

This is kind of a strange theory, given that the "aryans" who lived there were the Sanskrit speaking people of whom living Indians are probably the most direct living descendants, although like all modern peoples, other ethnicities have come into the mix in the thousands of years since.

The people of Europe, other than the Basques, are in some part descended - basically - from Indians. The traces of Sanskrit in our languages are the basic proof of this, along with certain alleles and blood factor properties found in modern Europeans.

Surely you don't labour under the impression that pale blonde people ever lived in India? Persian steles and engravings should put any such curious notion to rest. Light coloured hair was an adaptation of the earlier winter and cold-adapted Europeans, and not the Aryan arrivals.