I guess to an extent I do, not the communist part but rather the part of him not fearing change and thinking he could make a difference, whther it was good or bad in the end. Here is his short bio.
Guevara, Che
(Ernesto Guevara) (chā gāvä´rä, ārnĕs´tō) , 1928—67, Cuban revolutionary and political leader, b. Argentina. Trained as a physician at the Univ. of Buenos Aires, he took part (1952) in riots against the dictator Juan Perón in Argentina, joined agitators in Bolivia, and worked in a leper colony. In 1953 he went to Guatemala, joined the leftist regime of Jacobo Arbenz Guzmán, and when Arbenz was overthrown (1954) fled to Mexico, where he met Fidel Castro and other Cuban rebels. Guevara became Castro's chief lieutenant soon after the rebel invasion of Cuba in 1956, in which he proved to be a resourceful guerrilla leader. As president of the national bank after the fall (Jan., 1959) of Fulgencio Batista he was instrumental in cutting Cuba's traditional ties with the United States and in directing the flow of trade to the Communist bloc. He served (1961—65) as minister of industry. At heart a revolutionary rather than an administrator, he left Cuba in 1965 to foster revolutionary activity in the Congo and other countries. In 1967, directing an ineffective guerrilla movement in Bolivia, he was wounded, captured, and executed by government troops. Guevara wrote Guerrilla Warfare (1961), Man and Socialism in Cuba (1967), Reminiscences of the Cuban Revolutionary War (1968), and The African Dream (2001), a forthright account of the failed Congo rebellion.
2006-06-16 16:53:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by KWCHAMBER 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Che Guevara was a communist revolutionary. I do not agree with his beliefs and think that many of the problems in Latin American countries today are a result of a the flawed ideology of communism that he promoted.
"The social model of the Bolsheviks failed, as will any model that denies individual rights, intellectual freedom, and freedom of competing political parties. Without these freedoms and rights, there is no motivation for people to work. Such a system cannot be sustained, especially in light of the technological revolution of the information era."
-- Mikhail Gorbachev, (1999) former Soviet Leader on the tenth anniversary of the toppling of the Berlin Wall
"The whole gospel of Karl Marx can be summed up in a single sentence: Hate the man who is better off than you are. Never under any circumstances admit that his success may be due to his own efforts, to the productive contribution he has made to the whole community. Always attribute his success to the exploitation, the cheating, the more or less open robbery of others. Never under any circumstances admit that your own failure may be owing to your own weakness, or that the failure of anyone else may be due to his own defects -- his laziness, incompetence, improvidence, or stupidity."
-- Henry Hazlitt
2006-06-16 19:01:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Natasha 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
He was a doctor who joined Castor's paramilitary, then went to Congo, lastly Bolivia for social revolution. Killed by Bolivia military.
No I do not believe in the socialist party. If we divide everything equally, what is the incentive to work hard. He was an icon of socialist revolution.
2006-06-16 16:57:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Wolfpacker 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
he was an argentinian, ernesto guevara, a doctor, of irish ,basque and spanish ancestry/born 6/14/1928 killed 10/09/1967
2006-06-16 16:56:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by urbansurvivor 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, he was a communist idealist who failed to help the working class, they ended up oppressed even more than under the former leader.
2006-06-16 16:53:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Black Sabbath 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Communism caused more suffering and death than any idology in the history of mankind.
I don't agree with him, and I am quite glad he is dead.
2006-06-16 18:00:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Look him up on the internet. His last name is "Guevara". He was Fidel Castro's co-revolutionist.
2006-06-16 16:52:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by mcd 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not totally, he had communists beliefs and I'm not all for that.
2006-06-16 16:55:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by diehard0603 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, he was a magnificent man.
2015-05-03 17:23:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Amy 1
·
0⤊
0⤋