2006-06-16 16:09:52 · 9 answers · asked by Top 99% 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
Only if they are identified in a line-up.
2006-06-16 18:09:58 · answer #1 · answered by frankie59 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
And I thought that I had heard it all-----Well inventive one let's take this puppy on----Yes they would--by the letter of the law --if it is proven that the crime was commited by either- the other would serve time to under statues that cover complicitous behavior--meaning --if the one not doing the actual crime did not do everything in their power to prevent the act--they were in fact an accomplice to the crime--some sway and reduction of sentence for the two MIGHT occur because of the lessened seriousness of the second---so let's just say the one not responsible for the more serious criminal act would be carrying their sibbling's weight on theirself (I just HAD to add that)
2006-06-16 16:23:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably not even if the crime is a felony and one is convicted of the offense and the other convicted of aiding and abetting or similar offense. For one thing the prison system would have to be able to provide for their basic needs which would be unlikely for this circumstance.
2006-06-16 16:20:47 · answer #3 · answered by wefields@swbell.net 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, unless there's a procedure to surgically remove them before the sentencing.
Then again, it depends on what the crime is....
2006-06-16 16:13:55 · answer #4 · answered by dujoi84 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If they're still conjoined, I guess so.
2006-06-19 12:35:46 · answer #5 · answered by yankeechik 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
siamese twins generaly die if not seperated
2006-06-16 16:24:22 · answer #6 · answered by ben s 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
??? I don't know!!! That could get REAL messy in the shower!! A two-fer!
2006-06-16 16:24:14 · answer #7 · answered by Mr. Boof 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes as an accessory
2006-06-16 16:15:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lol, good question
2006-06-17 15:07:29 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋