No, the supreme court is expected to make a decision to prevent the federal government from prosecuting people for adhering to state laws while smoking pot for medicinal purposes. Medicinal pot is legal in California, but it's still a felony, so all these doctors are getting arrested for prescribing it, and the patients are getting arreset for possesing it. That's what the ruling is about.
2006-06-15 19:35:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Rockstar 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
1.Marijuana tablets that relieve pain without giving a high
2. Marijuana is favored by many people who have multiple sclerosis and cancer; they say cannabis kills pain and stimulates appetite without the corrosive side effects of many alternatives.
3.The Legalise Cannabis Alliance: fightling for legallization
I am sure one day it will be. See this: alcohol is legal but i causes so much deaths via car accidents.. does this make sense?
2006-06-15 19:42:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Puzzle 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i visit grant it a bypass... a million. that's a marginally reliable leisure drug to the bigger area of society, at the same time as positioned next to diverse resources, eg: alcohol. far a lot less unfavorable socially, criminally and actual. 2. next manage and taxation would progression both the customers (pleasant administration, protection and protection by lessened contact with criminal aspects) and better society (dealer regulation, taxation money and diminished criminal element in wider society). 3. A circulate faraway from our alcohol-centric leisure activities it really is so unbelieveably unfavorable to each and each unmarried area of our complete society can least confusing be a remarkable element. it is also no longer going to go away... now we were employing, as a society, hashish for hundreds of years - we adventure it, it really isn't any longer going to be stopped by ability of way of criminalising it. I actually have absolutely given you a good purchase of aspects, no longer merely 3 - although evaluate those hide it in 3 straight forward communities. As for the single reaction the anti-hashish "brigade" look to have, it really is that it ought to could be banned (and better criminalised)to look after the very very small minority of youthful human beings who adventure ill outcomes from it... probable in the adventure that they positioned their efforts in to looking a screening procedure for the underlying project (ie: approached the priority from a sensible perspective) then we would flow ahead and commence dealing with soemthing that needs controlling. We havent banned Peanuts with the aid of actual undeniable truth that some little ones are allergic to them... And Peanuts kill individuals, hashish merely sends some somewhat better psychological than they might already be, it type of feels that... it really is completely controversial and, i think, now no longer tested besides!!! the perfect reason for it, as can just about been significant from this talk, is that it does frequently have a tendency to make the guy a "real looking" and "reasoning" man or woman somewhat than some style of kneejerking, dogmatic automaton... look on the arguments positioned for and in the route of in this thread... i understand who i'd somewhat dangle out with! @John ok... don't be shy and do not carry them to your self... let's have them in the shape you've offered 'em... i'm always open to new information on issues.
2016-10-14 05:17:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by valda 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is a state issues, some states have people trying to pass it, others no real push
2006-06-16 00:58:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It might legaliz all kinds,. cause to save R. Mahajan!!
2006-06-15 19:35:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Koshy 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes it is all ready legal in denver
2006-06-15 19:25:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by queen_csl14 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I really don't know, but I hope not.
2006-06-19 12:20:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by yankeechik 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i havent heard any thing about it
2006-06-15 19:28:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by t_ibrahim 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think so
2006-06-15 19:25:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by kasik 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i doubt it
2006-06-15 19:27:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋