This was sexy the first two or three DOZEN times I saw it. Now it just seems to represent "The Mark of the Wh.r.". Do you have one? why did you get it? what do you think of those who choose to? I can't think of a bigger turn off!
2006-06-15 18:27:49 · 31 answers · asked by clive 2 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
I think it's the sign of a good hostess. She wants to entertain those coming in the back door.
2006-06-15 18:34:30 · answer #1 · answered by soosclues 1 · 13⤊ 1⤋
Well a few years ago I was really thinking about getting a lower back tattoo but now they are so common I'm glad I never. During my last year of high school, which was only a year ago, there were 8 girls in my class who got butterflies on their lower back. It's just way too overdone and when something is overdone people get tired of seeing it.
2006-06-16 01:33:40 · answer #2 · answered by Krista P 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why is having a lower back tattoo the "mark of the wh*re"? D*amn talk about being judge mental. It's ok to not like something, but to label a group of people because of a drawing is asinine.
No, I do not have one. As far as what I think of people who choose to get them, I don't. I don't think anything about it. If I see someone with it, no negative thoughts enter my mind. If it's a pretty or unique tattoo, THAT sticks in my mind.
2006-06-16 01:31:33 · answer #3 · answered by adagia27 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
<~~ Has a "tramp stamp". My first tattoo, back in 1993, was a black shaded replica of an Edward Gorey illustration called The Insect God. Since I wanted it rather large, to make the skeletal features clear, I had it inked on my lower back.
I think ankle tattoos are lamer.
I am currently sleeving my right arm. Yay!
2006-06-16 01:42:14 · answer #4 · answered by murkglider 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing is a bigger turn off to me than a tatoo on a girl
2006-06-16 01:30:39 · answer #5 · answered by Alias Anarchist 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that tatoos on the lower back have gotten played out over time and every female nowadays has one.
2006-06-16 01:30:04 · answer #6 · answered by universalist 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on what kind of image suits the woman. If she looks like the long,curly black haired typed with dark,mysterious gaze and a body that you'll just die for, and she starts pulling out those dual-baretta and demands you do things you only heard of in the sunset lands. Or if she looks like somebody who just stepped out of Jacqueline Carey's novels. Then yes, its sexy.
But if she looks like your girl next door, brunette with glasses, religious goody goody type, I dont think so. Unless its a betty boop tattoo cuz I wouldnt mind starin at it for some time.
2006-06-16 01:45:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on what tattoo a women get's on her back. no I don't have one. I am only 15 years old. It costs a lot of money and it's way too much pain... women who want a tattoo should be brave enough to handle the pressure!
2006-06-16 01:34:00 · answer #8 · answered by Samantha D 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I dig Tattoos! I have one on my hand and on my lower back! Why is it a turn off if a woman has one but not a man that has them all over. Your just jealous because your mommy wouldn't let you have one.
2006-06-16 01:36:41 · answer #9 · answered by Humming Bird 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have a tattoo on my lower back in memory of my dad, i got it there because I don't think a tattoo on me anywhere else would have looked right... I love it though, but my husband says i should have gotten it someplace else.. LOL.. But I'm not a wh0re or anything..
2006-06-16 01:31:11 · answer #10 · answered by Heather 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Women with tattoo's are a turn-off. Looks cheap and makes you think they're sluts. They may not be of course, but that's the impression you get.
2006-06-16 01:35:05 · answer #11 · answered by DR. HARPOâ⢠5 · 0⤊ 0⤋