Can Bush and his new ideology of preventive war be associated with Hitler and fascism ?

Question

Pre-emptive war is the term when an attack is emminent..There were no such thing coming from Iraq..


review theinformation contained in the animation below.


Bush is no Nazi..

http://www.tbtmradio.com/geeklog/public_html/staticpages/index.php?page=20040606194007963

http://web.takebackthemedia.com/geeklog/public_html/staticpages/index.php?page=20040618050418549

http://www.takebackthemedia.com/bushnonazi.html

( neocons believe that in 30 years from now people would thank georges bush for having destroyed the middle-east and arabs to secure oil control market..

A lot of germans believe the same thing about the genocide..Note the german boorowed their propaganda model on the British so did the Americans therefore it is impossible for you to say its not comparable, the techniques of mass manipulation haven't changed.

I think that whole war ideology is sic.. Dont you think so ?
Is Bush propaganda comparable to Hitler..

Actually lot of german people were thinking that
Hitler was the only one able to protect them from terror, they also believe that people would thank hitler for what he did to the Jew's of Europe.

Actually The IBM company supplied the german with a data base system that were numbering and colleting all information on the jews to be exterminated..

IBM actually provided support with this info systems inside the death camps while jews were being gased.

Answer 1

The answer to that is quite easy, look around America.
What we are all seeing right before our eyes is what could be the beginning of the end of the America as we once enjoyed. We are selling our future to the Chinese as fast as they can buy it, U.S. world respect and reputation are at an all time low. We allow 1 corrupt political party to govern and dictate law. The president does not lead by example, he is pulled around by his nose by lobbyists and religion and lies about all his mistakes. Yeah Bill Clinton lied but no one died,
I will leave you with a quote that rings true and no matter what your political affiliation may be just reflect on this powerful statement for a Minuit.

“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America, nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”

Herman Goering

Answer 2

Ummmmmm...........no. First off, Bush never said he wanted to destroy a race or region. He said he wanted Saddam out of power. That's one person. Not a race. He didn't even say he wanted Saddam dead... just gone. People that look at pretty much anyone and try to compare them to Hitler needs to crack a history book. Hitler wanted world domination and to destroy all of the races that weren't "pure" races (Jews, Gypsies, Arabs, etc). Even going out to an extreme and saying that this was an "oil war" doesn't even come close to comparing the two. Which while we're on it, it's not an oil war. The US hasn't recieved a penny of the profits from oil or the oil itself. Most of the contracts went to foreign contractors anyway. Halliburton got the drilling contract, and thats about it. They style of propaganda that people use around the world is the same "We're right and [insert opposing view here] is wrong". So by that, this means that Bush's propaganda is the same as Churchill, Thatcher, FDR, Taft, TR, Lenin, Stalin, or any other leader that said someone else was wrong.
Oh yeah, the thing about Gitmo being like a concentration camp and disreguard of the Geneva Convention/Rules of War..... They were not uniformed, they were combatants of unknown origin, which makes the Geneva Convention and all of its rules null and void.

Answer 3

I wouldn't go as far as to compare him to Hitler, but this war is a terrible stain on our country. Bush lied about WMD and Wolfowitz said that oil would pay for the war which leads one to believe that the only reason for the war was oil How ironic since we are paying more for oil now than ever. The other black mark comes from the way the military has diregarded the Geneva Convention in regard to torture and no trials. Abu Graib and Guantanamo Bay are similar to concentration camps. Very bad indeed. We need to throw these war criminals out.

Answer 4

Nice political diatribe, er, question...

The only comparison to Bush and Hitler is "Pre-emptive" action action against Hitler would have prevented WW2. But, since no one had a crystal ball to determine the future, he was allowed to build influence and arms. I guess some of us have learned from history's mistakes, hence the pre-emptive strike on a regime that was openly hostile, used WMD's in the past, and had invaded it's neighbors... While others, such as yourself, can discern and regurgitate the facts from the books but completely miss their meaning and importance..

Answer 5

indeed!! (new world order) requires a mass population reduction inorder to achieve the goal.
the bushes are big supporters of the new world order. they among many other government officials through out the glob are in on it.
the only difference between hitler and bush is that hitler's philosophy infact helped benefit germany. there was no unemployment and people were productive.
thats ofcourse befofore he tottally lost his mind by his attempt to takeover the world.
so yeah bush and hitler doshare some things in my opinion.

Answer 6

Yes, it does appear so. Mussollini advocated the concept of corporatism, Hitler liked that but changed the name to fascism. The Bush family had ties to Hitler's regime.

It is time for the American people to take back our country. Our constitution does say "we the people" not "we the rich"...

Answer 7

i think what you suggest is twisted and sic....we didn't attack Iraq out of pre-emptive war...we attack Iraq because they violated UN resolutions over and over again...did you forget that?!?

your links are interesting but i didn't see any links to show evidence of what it stated...sounds like you are the new propaganda machine...just remember fighting in the world will never end...please tell me a time when there was no conflicts anywhere on the earth...that has never happened because people are always in conflicts...that is part of out nature...why else would you promote your idea like this...unless you want to have conflict with others...or you are trying to promote coflict in others...

Answer 8

i dont think its comparable to hitler..but not intellegent..As a christian, i feel like he is going against the ideals he himself claims to be a part of...if one reads the bible its about loving, helping, grace, all things that dont qualify as war....there are many places in the world that need our military..but to stop genocide(peace keeping missions) not to encourage it..ie sudan, zimbabwe, haiti...etc...

Answer 9

No.

But facts have never stopped the idiots from believieng this.

Answer 10

absolutely,,, but did Hitler proclaim to be a born-again Christian?