If God made you infertile, I don't think you can be held liable for that.
2006-06-15 11:27:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
0⤋
Now everyone can cure infertility using this natural remedy http://pregnancyhelps.info
infertility can run in the family and one of the first things the doctor asks you when you go to a fertility clinic is your family history regarding cases of infertility or other reproductive issues.
If infertility is caused by genetic disorder then it's not unusual that one of the kids (your mom) doesn't have it and another does (your aunt).
two months of trying is still to early to be concerned about the fact that you might be infertile and it's also quite early to go to a fertility specialist. Go to a regular Obgyb to get a closer insight and see what ways there are are to improve your fertility rate.
Also remove alcohol, caffeine and cigarettes from your life because they might influence your chances too. Stress is also a risk factor when it comes to infertility.
2014-12-21 16:22:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, God's intent for a man and woman are to marry and procreate. However, God created man and woman for each other. He clearly states in the Bible that homosexual relationships are "an abomination" ... not only for non-procreation but because sexually the way sexual relations occur is wrong. A man does what to another man ... a woman does what to another woman and then sometimes they buy toys to act out the other gender ... if the sex (alone) was right, why is there a desire to buy extras, pretending to be the opposite sex.
2006-06-15 11:32:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by CuriousGirl 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
A man and a woman cannot validly marry if they are certain that they cannot produce children. This is the primary purpose of marriage. (However this differs in the case of the elderly, I believe.) A man and a woman commit a very serious sin indeed if they marry and then decide to have no children. And a man and a woman cannot marry validly if they decide against children before they are married. In the same token, without grave reason, a woman and man sin if they limit their family size. However, there is no sin involved if they are unable to have children and were not aware of this fact before they married.
2006-06-15 11:30:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by oremus_fratres 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
He told us to be fruitful and multiply because at that time, there was no overpopulation. I think we did the multiplying thing too well, so its not really a need to keep multiplying at this point. It is not a sin to be infertile, and I seriously doubt its a sin to decide not to have children. If you're infertile and want kids, adopt. If you simply don't want them, no problem, its better not to have them if you don't want them. I truly believe God expected us to use the common sense He gave us.
2006-06-15 12:47:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
When you can't get pregnant, and things look good from the outside, it can be extremely frustrating.
The first thing to consider is how long have you been trying. About 80% of couples will get pregnant after six months of trying, and about 90% will be pregnant after 12 months of trying to get pregnant. Anyway this is a great methid to get pregnant fast https://tr.im/fd75a
2015-01-25 03:27:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you're infertile, then you can't help that. But if you deliberately choose to marry and have no children then I think that's wrong. At the very least it violates the spirit of the law. But all the same, I don't think that has much (if anything) to do with why homosexuality is morally unacceptable. That's an entirely different matter.
2006-06-15 11:33:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Billy 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
No it is not a sin. Hellooo...free will!
I am childless by choice. I feel it is more sinful to bring unwanted children into the world who are resented or abused, or neglected. I think that I would resent no longer having my freedom to do as I please. You probably think, "oh, you wouldn't feel that way once they are here"...well, think again.
I have several friends with young children who pine for the childless life they gave up in order to conform to society's expectations that all couples should have children.
Don't have kids and be a sinner or have them, maybe treat them like crap, resent and neglect them and be a sinner? I think I'll choose the lesser of two "evils" that doesn't involve hurting children.
2006-06-15 14:01:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by LindaLou 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would strong disagree with that argument.. We are already sucking up our daily means.. everyday is getting more tougher for everyone because there are more than yesterday who want as much as we want. Having no child today would be like being a philanthropist and father of the world who cares for it and the people already living.
Lets give pause or brake to this never ending population growth..
And please also leave alone those poor aquatic and flying animals. Your rule is one of the least things they want and deserve.
2006-06-15 11:33:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by masku darling 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
i personally don't think that it is wrong. i do believe it hinges on what you personally believe. what does your religion tell you and do you believe it. we are also told that man is "steward of the earth" and considering how many unwanted children there are and the global overpopulation in general, i question, if we are to be good stewards, whether having children is a responsible act at all. my fiancee always knew he didn't want children. he felt that there were children out there who's lives he could enrich, without having any of his own. and he has done that. i don't see how any god could condem that decision. and as for the "gay" argument, there will always be those who use the bible and their interperation of it as a weapon against real or imagined enemies. only you can determine if the wound they leave will be fatal.
2006-06-15 11:32:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by bratchild699 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
hmm....well as far as I'm concerned, there are far too many people on this damn planet as it is.
anyways, this reminds me of Oedipus Rex and crime vs. intent.
if christians do believe that it is a sin to not procreate than chosing to not produce children would be sinful, however not procreating because of infertility would lack intent thus not be a sin.
2006-06-15 11:30:01
·
answer #11
·
answered by Burlesque Beauty 3
·
1⤊
0⤋