scrambled eggs prove the existence of God...and that He does have a sense of humour.
light fluffyness that is delicious in the morning...and it came from a chicken's behind.
ta-da.
2006-06-17 15:46:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by sharrron 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Scrambled eggs are the absolute proof deities don't exist, and there is no afterlife.
I could have given out a great answer, but unluckily, you wanted me to put the words 'scrambled eggs' in my answer, so I had to suppress some other more important words.
2006-06-16 10:09:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by bloody_gothbob 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Can you prove Love exists? How's that for scrambled eggs?
2006-06-15 11:51:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Amma's Child 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are probably new here, Scrambled Eggs. We've been over and over this, scrambled our eggs time after time. No one can prove that God does or does not exist--it is a matter of one's personal faith (or lack of) that determines his or her scrambled eggs.
2006-06-15 10:35:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
To prove the existence or non-existence of God by showing someone the material world is analogous to trying to prove the existence or non-existence of a hen by the showing someone scrambled eggs.
2006-06-15 10:34:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by NeoArt 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The existence of God is a subject that has occupied schools of philosophy and theology for thousands of years. Most of the time, these debates have revolved around all kinds of assumptions and definitions. Philosophers will spend a lifetime arguing about the meaning of a word and never really get there. One is reminded of the college student who was asked how his philosophy class was going. He replied that they had not done much because when the teacher tried to call roll, the kids kept arguing about whether they existed or not.
Most of us who live and work in the real world do not concern ourselves with such activities. We realize that such discussions may have value and interest in the academic world, but the stress and pressure of day-to-day life forces us to deal with a very pragmatic way of making decisions. If I ask you to prove to me that you have $2.00, you would show it to me. Even in more abstract things we use common sense and practical reasoning. If I ask you whether a certain person is honest or not, you do not flood the air with dissertations on the relative nature of honesty; you would give me evidence one way or the other. The techniques of much of the philosophical arguments that go on would eliminate most of engineering and technology if they were applied in those fields.
The purpose of this brief study is to offer a logical, practical, pragmatic proof of the existence of God from a purely scientific perspective. To do this, we are assuming that we exist, that there is reality, and that the matter of which we are made is real. If you do not believe that you exist, you have bigger problems than this study will entail and you will have to look elsewhere.
2006-06-19 01:24:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope. If you have faith. Then you just have faith and if you don't then you just don't. There is no way to prove any of that stuff. I was discussing this very thing while i was eating scrambled eggs with my sister. I believe in god and she is a bit confused is the best way I can put it. Believe in your beliefs. There is nothing else you can do.
2006-06-15 10:36:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by The_Answer_Man™ 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
What caused the Big Bang that started the whole universe? (That also lead to scrambled eggs...) Something at some point started all of this, God seems like the one to me.
2006-06-15 10:35:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jammy D 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Scrambled eggs. Proof that there is a God. He created you and the chicken that laid the egg that you scrambled. Thank you, Lord.
2006-06-15 10:34:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by the Goddess Angel 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
My personal opinion is that he/she doesn't. My logic goes something like this; there are a few hundred different major religions in the world, mixed together like scrambled eggs. They all think they are correct and driven by their version of the word of God(s). The odds of exactly one of them being correct is very, very low, but the odds of all of them being incorrect is very high. There is no logical inconsistency if they are all wrong. And, all of their "better, simpler explanations" of science depend on the instantaneous creation or perpetual existance of an infinitely powerful and complex being, which is totally ridiculous. Also, the idea that anyone who doesn't believe in "the one correct religion" is going to go to hell tells me that most folks worship an evil god anyway. Who wants that?
2006-06-15 10:54:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Tom J 2
·
0⤊
0⤋