English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

14 answers

Any attack is the worst. Their have been rumors of attacking subway stations, poisoning our water supplies, attacking nuclear power plants, etc...But wouldn't any attack, no matter how mild or severe, would be the worst outcome for the US. Then we can go waste time in courts about how the government failed and point fingers at high officials while terrorists plan another attack. The violent attack is only the beginning, the aftermath wars within the US government is what really sickens me. So until war ends, yeah right, all attacks are terrible and all we can do is wish our soldiers good luck.

Godspeed

2006-06-15 10:01:47 · answer #1 · answered by luckee45 1 · 5 3

i think the worst terrorist attack would be that terrorists could infiltrate into secure areas, ie, cheyenne, white house, fort knox. and cause some damage. while the actual attack wouldnt be too bad. it would show that the us is vulnerable, and therefore, the us would tighten up security everywhere, lowering citizen's morale and raising dislike toward the us. which eventually will destroy the us from within, because if the us doesnt have strong support, nothing it will do will work.

gentle hand vs. iron fist.

2006-06-15 08:05:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

effortless answer: nationwide protection would not merely "ensue". we've not experienced yet another attack because the Bush administration took preemptive measures. The economy is cyclic. that is an theory...take a straightforward direction in Economics, say ECON101, and perchance you'll study some thing rather of creating assumptions.

2016-11-14 19:51:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't think there will be another big terrorist attack on United States cause I have faith in our military to stop them pig scum terrorist.

2006-06-15 08:51:53 · answer #4 · answered by joonam_21 3 · 0 0

what ever our government dreams up the next time there are no terrorist that attacked NYC it was all a well layed out plan to get the us to go to war and if you don't be live me go to go ogle and look up loose change 2ND edition and watch the video

2006-06-15 08:48:04 · answer #5 · answered by vitofatcat 1 · 0 0

hmmm we are at war with terrorists so I think their target will Be the United States. Hope fully nothing happens in the future its so sad when innocent people die!!

2006-06-15 07:47:10 · answer #6 · answered by shasha 3 · 0 0

Worst case senerio for an attack would be either a "tactical" nuclear weapon or the famous dirty bomb. Either of these senrios would leave an area hot for many years.

2006-06-15 16:04:52 · answer #7 · answered by dustoff03 1 · 0 0

That must mean you DISAGREE with Bush that the Iraqis deserve our help, and that the insurgents are just a few out of the many people who deserve democracy... which means all our soldiers who are there have wasted their time and lives on people who should be destroyed.

2006-06-15 07:44:37 · answer #8 · answered by Truth 5 · 0 0

who knows, but hopefully these terorist are not so bright as they think, because if they were they could easily shut down some of the Internet backbon or giant sites or even try to......
I dont really want to say that maybe a terorist reads it by any chance and think of it ( but hurting people is easy) make them happy is hard

2006-06-15 07:45:35 · answer #9 · answered by yossarian 2 · 0 0

If Osama Bin Laden could somehow find a way to get Hillary Clinton elected, that would be pretty devastating.

2006-06-15 07:51:54 · answer #10 · answered by Phil My Crack In 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers