Well, if that was true then would it be cannibalism to kill and eat a chicken? I guess you have to draw the line somewhere. Why not with the chicken.
If YOU thought of this question though I appreciate the way your mind works.
2006-06-16 05:58:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
on condition which you have been eating human eggs. by eggs i've got self assurance you mean rooster eggs, that are actually not even fertilized in any case.. yet whether they have been.. to be against abortion you're to be against the killing of existence. there is not any thank you to stay as a mammal without the killing of existence.. even vegetables. Abortion and veganism are 2 seperate ideas. To be anti-abortionist is to be anti-murderer. homicide is the killing of a human by a human. Animals do no longer fall into this classification so your question is innately at fault because of the undeniable fact that whether the rooster eggs we consume are unquestionably fertilized.. its no diverse from eating a rooster wing.
2016-12-08 09:25:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
An unfertilized eggs is food just as a grown chicken is food. to have the audacity to compare that to a child. a fetus is another word for BABY that is used when we want to murder one. We have sunk so low as to cry for a puppy form a line to save a tree yet thousands of children are being murdered in their mothers womb daily and few of us care. I thought the mothers womb was the most sacred and safest place for a child to be placed not any more.
Has a child been degraded to just an inconvenient out come of somebodies folly? something to disregard be cause i don't have time or just don't want it! Have we become so heartless that we can sit a abortion rallies and cheer over clips of children being aborted how sick has our society become. Just open your eyes look at what is going on please!!
yea you know i will ask this question to see how many people still care.
2006-06-15 07:17:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by question man 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I think so.
But what is your point? The eggs that we eat at breakfast didn't come from humans. They came from chickens.
So, it has absolutely nothing to do with abortion. No offense, but this is a pretty ridiculous argument to make if your intent is to justify abortion.
Not to mention, nobody who's against abortion regards the eggs in a human female's body as human life. Only when it is fertilized by the sperm -- in other words, when conception happens -- does it become human life.
So, this truth renders your argument even more ridiculous.
2006-06-15 06:51:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just to let you know this is irrelevant because the type of eggs that you buy from the market or grocery store are infertile and would never become a chicken or any other type of animal at that.
2006-06-15 06:50:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by foolnomore2games 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Last time I check chickens where not listed under humans in the dictionary or encyclopedia of course things have changed since I was in school. The part about love all creatures, I have to say I do. I love chicken with biscuits, I love pork chops with mash potatoes, i love..........
2006-06-15 06:57:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by PREACHER'S WIFE 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you honestly comparing a human life to a chicken??? Do you eat eggs or have you ever eaten a fertilized egg? (why?) Do you eat any kind of plant or fish? They have all been living at one point...they are here for our use.
2006-06-15 06:53:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Regular chicken eggs from the store are not fertilized. Dont believe me? Ask
2006-06-15 06:49:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Animals are not people. We can eat all things. Abortion is murder. The Lord Jesus didn't die for their sins because animals don't sin. Romans 5: 12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:
2006-06-15 06:54:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ray W 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Vegetarianism is a separate issue for mainstream Americans, who follow the doctrine that human life is sacred (that is, possessing a soul) but animal life is not.
2006-06-15 06:50:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by juniemoon 3
·
0⤊
0⤋