Is Ricardo Carezani relativistic formula for the charge of the electron correct?

Question

note the definition of charge in the Quantum aether dynamics theory refers to several different types of charge variances?

Answer 1

The primary claim of Autodynamics is that the equations of the Lorentz transformation are incorrectly formulated to describe relativistic effects, which would invalidate special relativity and general relativity. The effect of the revised equations proposed in Autodynamics is to cause particle mass to decrease with particle velocity, being exchanged with kinetic energy (with mass being zero and kinetic energy being equal to the rest mass at c). This exchange between mass and energy is the proposed mechanism underlying most of the derived conclusions of Autodynamics.

Secondary claims of Autodynamics include:

* the nonexistence of the neutrino,
* the existence of additional particles that have not been observed by mainstream physicists (including the "picograviton" and the "electromuon"),
* the existence of additional decay modes for muons and interaction modes for energetic atomic nuclei.

In particular, autodynamics proponents cite a 1946 experiment by William W. Buechner and Robert J. Van de Graaff which failed to observe any "missing energy" when a high-energy electron beam stopped in a calorimeter[1]; this result rejected the idea that the energy losses reported for the scattering of beta-rays by heavy nuclei could be accounted for by the emission of neutrinos (as had been suggested by Ellis & Wooster[11] and Meitner & Orthmann[12]). Although a legitimate question in the 1940s, the result is clearly consistent with mainstream relativity and the Standard Model of particle physics. Carezani claims that the results are consistent with AD[13] and, for unclear reasons, inconsistent with relativity. AD proponents generally claim that all published observations of the neutrino are due to experimental errors.

Answer 2

maximum scientists might say that a velocity 10% of sunshine is relativistic, others might say 20%. At 10p.c.c, the relativistic correction for mass and length is 5.4%. At 20p.c.c, it is 11.8% At 90p.c.c, it is 216% At 99p.c.c, it is 900% at ninety 9.999p.c.c, an merchandise seems to be 315 circumstances greater massive, and a million/315 the scale of its relax mass and length.