English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

And if science can prove that there always was matter and energy in existence, and that it didn't come from nowhere, does this make our search for God meaningless, since the God mythology is dependent upon God being a creator, if there was never a creation?


IF science can't proove this, must we as atheists and agnostics recognize that matter and energy came into existence, and investigate the possiblity of a God. NOT that it has to be the Christian God, but certainly now that it is within the realm of possibility, couldn't it be the Christian God, with his white beard grey robe and fireballs? IF there is a God why do we have to limit it to our own fascination?

2006-06-15 04:49:05 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

8 answers

It's just retarded to attribute the original appearance of anything to an omnipotent, loving, human-like personality.

Energy appeared first. It turned into matter. Whether the energy existed before this universe, or outside of it, we don't know.

2006-06-15 05:03:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Going on the Big Bang theory, in the beginning there was a singularity. Singularities can contain a theoretically infinite quanity of matter and energy and take up an infinitely small amount of space. The laws of physics also have a habit of breaking down when it comes to working with singularities.


Although maybe there was a god or gods who sparked off the big bang. We will never know for sure, and we have no ways of proving or disproving the existence of higher powers. This makes the existence of god a matter of personal faith, and faith and science should never be mixed together.

2006-06-15 04:55:54 · answer #2 · answered by Toutatis 4 · 0 0

you're making 2 elementary blunders. (FIRST) One is in affirming that you're “proving that god can exist”. you could’t teach that some thing can ensue. get jointly: You drop a penny from the only centesimal floor of a progression. The guidelines of physics would have it that that's available for this penny to land interior a bucket that's placed on the sidewalk after the penny first hits the sidewalk and then it bounces into the bucket. A physics professor can calculate how a lot speed the penny will get carry of on the way down and at which attitude it ought to hit the sidewalk and at which region it ought to hit the sidewalk as a fashion to bop in one of those fashion as a fashion to land contained in the bucket. With actuality, the penny can land contained in the bucket if it bounces wonderful. And the professor can calculate the angles required for this to happen. Does this teach that it may ensue? satirically, no it doesn’t. Why; by way of the indisputable fact that's available that it ought to under no circumstances ensue no remember what number cases someone drops a penny from the progression. So in truth it has no longer been ‘shown’ that it may ensue. (2d) You anticipate that each and each man or woman atheists enroll in the great bang theory. incorrect; all atheists typically trust that there is no god. That’s it! Many atheists are unsettled about the position all of it got here from (if it even has an starting place). There many theories about the position we got here from inclusive of distinct universes.

2016-10-30 22:49:04 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Haven't they already proved that everthing is made up of energy and that matter is just energy vibrating at a different level. And that angry never ceases to exist but just changes form.

I don't know about proving it, but they are already hypothesizing that our world is not even real but maybe a hologram. If this is so I think that it definitely proves that God exists. However, I think it proves that God is probably more like the Celestial Prophecy book than that of the bible.

2006-06-15 05:02:12 · answer #4 · answered by cj 4 · 0 0

Yes it can be scientifically proven that there was never nothing. If there is nothing it would have to be outside of the realm of existence and in the realm of non-existence. If nothing is in the realm of non-existence and something is in the realm of existence, then nothing does not exist and something does exist. Following this could there ever be a time when something did not exist? Absolutely not. Time only exists in relation to matter, before matter existed time did not exist. So we can say for sure that nothing does not exist and nothing never existed, therefore for all time something has existed. Matter is merely a manifestation of energy so this something must be energy.

2006-06-15 04:56:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'd say no, really. Take your keyboard for example. What does it consist of? Hm, carbon maybe? And carbon? Uhh, atoms? Good, and atoms? Errr, don't know, quarks?

See where that is going? It just gets smaller, but it is never nothing, everything is something. Infinity can't be measured/proven. Or maybe infinity IS nothing like nothing is infinite...sorry, now I'm just going hippie on ya.

Oh, some say God is infinite. But that's also quite hippie.

2006-06-15 11:06:33 · answer #6 · answered by Darth Hjalmar (Green) 2 · 0 0

"God" might be a name for the Supreme Laws
and forces that govern at all times in all places

2006-06-15 07:12:45 · answer #7 · answered by dattatreya 3 · 0 0

No because it is already proven that life cannot come from nothing or a non-living organism.

2006-06-15 04:54:00 · answer #8 · answered by Damian 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers