English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

25 answers

YES

2006-06-15 01:22:44 · answer #1 · answered by mel 3 · 0 0

Well I dont know about Castrated, some ppl choose to turn their live around after they have lived a horrible one. We think the Michael Jackson is a child molestor but No one would ever dream of ever making him be castrated. However, I think that child molestors need a close watch and should remain in custody and undergo some kind of treatment. Like I said some ppl choose to turn their life around someday they may want to get married and so forth....

2006-06-15 08:25:55 · answer #2 · answered by LawGal 2 · 0 0

No they should be shot en mass. Ex. take a hundred of them





Of course. Just before they were shot. Ex. Take 100 of them, castrate them. Assign numbers. Shoot them one at a time forcing the rest of them to watch. After number 90, have the remaining 10 draw numbers again in conjunction with 90 more molesters. Keep repetition until there there are none left.

2006-06-16 22:42:48 · answer #3 · answered by oscar 2 · 0 0

There are many uninhabited islands that are owned by various countries, for example off the north west coast of Scotland there are thousands, i think we should put the ******* on one of those so they can fend for themselves and no longer strike fear into the communities in which they are placed. In this country the libertarians seem to have gone mad, recently in england there was a guy and his girlfriend who raped a 3 month old child and he got 8yrs and she got 5yrs, this is a huge drain on the economy and when they are released they get mollycoddled and wrapped in cotton wool then placed into a small town (anonymously) where they are free to commit these horrible crimes again, it ****** stinks put the beasts on an island and with any luck they will fight amongst themselves to the death.

vote me for prime minister

2006-06-15 08:31:02 · answer #4 · answered by jonnybeanos 2 · 0 0

I think repeat child molesters and first time child molesters should be terminated. Why help them.... cuz it's a "problem" it's a "disease" cuz of their "up bringing." I don't care who you are you know right from wrong from age 12 and up... no excuses child molesters should be shark bait at Sea World or donated to science where they can be infected with terminal illness and experimented with for a cure and if cured terminated.... of course, that's just my opinion....

2006-06-15 10:46:59 · answer #5 · answered by okchico 3 · 0 0

I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT CHILD MOLESTERS EVER CHANGE. IF A PERSON HAS AN ATTRACTION TO CHILDREN, IT'S LIKE ME HAVING AN ATTRACTION TO MEN- IT'S NOT GOING TO CHANGE. I COULD NOT GO THROUGH MY WHOLE LIFE NOT WANTING TO BE WITH A MAN, SO HOW WILL THE MOLESTER GO WITHOUT WANTING TO BE WITH A CHILD? I FEEL BADLY FOR THEM IN A WAY, BUT I FEEL A LOT SORRIER FOR THE KIDS THEY HURT. AS MUCH AS I HATE TO SAY IT, I BELIEVE THAT IF SOMEONE MOLESTS A CHILD, IF THE EVIDENCE IS 100% INCRIMINATING, THEY SHOULD BE GIVEN THE DEATH PENALTY WITH NO CHANCE TO APPEAL. OUR KIDS ARE OUR FUTURE, AND IF SOMEONE MOLESTED MY KID, I'D KILL HIM MYSELF- AFTER ALL, HE'S KILLED A PART OF MY CHILD THAT HE'LL NEVER GET BACK.

2006-06-15 11:30:34 · answer #6 · answered by wesleyapril 1 · 0 0

No i reckon all child molesters should be given the same punishment they dish out on kids...stick them in general population and let justice be served that way!!!

2006-06-15 08:25:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. Punishment by mutilation is wrong, whether it's Saudis chopping off peoples' hands, feet and ears or you shrivelling their penises with chemicals. It's a disgusting, repulsive suggestion. Eugh.

2006-06-15 10:13:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Absolutley!

2006-06-15 14:20:07 · answer #9 · answered by kjward518 2 · 0 0

Absolutely Not,
They should be shot between the eyes so everyone can see. Until their punishment is more that watching porn in prison, with us paying for it, they will never be deterred!

2006-06-15 10:27:57 · answer #10 · answered by Justice 1 · 0 0

It would be cheaper, to deploy 55 grains of diplomacy to the head.

2006-06-15 17:35:11 · answer #11 · answered by Battlerattle06 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers