English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

19 answers

because its a tradition one of the popes brought in.

there is not one baby baptised in the Holy Bible. you see, baptism is an important desicion, and everyone who does it in the bible is aware of what they are doing, and knows what it means. therefore baby baptisms are not effective, coz the child has no idea what going on. u can dedicate ur baby, thats different, thats just praying over a child (getting a pastor to) in a church, and blessing the child and praying that the baby will say yes to Jesus when it's old enough.

baby baptism is unscriptural, un-necessary and just tradition.

2006-06-15 01:18:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

Catholic parents naturally want their children initiated into the religion they believe in. They are not baptised again, but they go through the sarament of confirmation when they are older and at some stage during the rest of their lives they make a choice as to whether to remain a Catholic or not.

There is little in the bible about this . Jesus was of course initiated into the Jewish faith when he was 8 days old. The apostle Peter baptised the whole household of Cornelius (Acts of the Apostles). Paul also speaks about the baptism of whole households. (Sorry I don't know the Ch. and verse off-hand.) I think we can assume that a household at that time would include children, even babies.
I hope this helps.
It is something like the story of the paralysed man who was brought to Jesus by his friends, presumably because they had faith in Jesus.

2006-06-15 01:40:28 · answer #2 · answered by Palamino 4 · 0 0

Why Baptise Babies

2016-12-18 08:13:53 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

You can find the official teachings of the Catholic Church in the Catholic Catechism, as follows:

The Baptism of infants

1250 Born with a fallen human nature and tainted by original sin, mchildren also have need of the new birth in Baptism to be freed from the power of darkness and brought into the realm of the freedom of the children of God, to which all men are called.50 The sheer gratuitousness of the grace of salvation is particularly manifest in infant Baptism. The Church and the parents would deny a child the priceless grace of becoming a child of God were they not to confer Baptism shortly after birth.51

1251 Christian parents will recognize that this practice also accords with their role as nurturers of the life that God has entrusted to them.52

1252 The practice of infant Baptism is an immemorial tradition of the Church. There is explicit testimony to this practice from the second century on, and it is quite possible that, from the beginning of the apostolic preaching, when whole "households" received baptism, infants may also have been baptized.53


Beyond that, my answer as a mother is that infant baptism is the primary way for parents to give to their children the gift of their own faith. It is a gift that will be with their children all of their lives, being entrusted to God's grace, a gift which we never outgrow for as long as we live.

Lori

2006-06-15 01:33:35 · answer #4 · answered by Lori 1 · 0 0

The Catechism of the Catholic Church states, "Born with a fallen human nature and tainted by original sin, children also have need of the new birth in Baptism to be freed from the power of darkness and brought into the realm of the freedom of the children of God, to which all men are called."

Infant baptism is not a new thing. There are non-biblical documented sources starting in the second century telling of infant Baptism.

There are even several passages in the Bible where whole households were baptized. This would include everyone who lived there, men, women, children, and infants.

Acts 16:15, "After she and her household had been baptized"

Acts 16:33, "then he and all his family were baptized at once."

Acts 18:8, "came to believe in the Lord along with his entire household, and many of the Corinthians who heard believed and were baptized."

1 Corinthians 1:16, "I baptized the household of Stephanas"

The Catholic Church recognizes the need for one baptism. It recognizes and affirms the baptism of any other Christian church, if the person was baptized with water and the words, "I baptize you in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen."

With love in Christ.

2006-06-15 16:59:17 · answer #5 · answered by imacatholic2 7 · 0 0

Babies are baptized to cleanse them of the Original sin which was committed by Adam and Eve. No, there is no need to be baptized a second time. In the second year of education Catholics make their First Communion and then at around 15, education is complete and are Confirmed as a fully educated, adult member of the Catholic community.

2006-06-15 01:17:05 · answer #6 · answered by AlongthePemi 6 · 0 0

Babies are alleged to carry the sin of Adam and Eve.(original sin)
If they die before they are baptised they can't get into heaven. There's no reason to get baptised again as an adult because the sin is gone.

2006-06-15 01:49:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Infant baptism is a way of consecrating a child to God. It is a sacrament of God's church. A sacrament being an outward and visible sign of an inward and invisible Grace. There are no second baptisms. Once is sufficient. As a young adult Roman Catholics and Anglicans have confirmation where the person promises to live up to the promises their parents made on their behalf when they were baptized as infants.

2006-06-15 01:26:13 · answer #8 · answered by Desultorious 1 · 0 0

I believe Catholics think that as long as you are baptized once, you don't have to ever be baptized again. Therefore, they're normally baptized at birth so that it's done and out of the way. Baptizing at birth not only cleans the sins of the child's future but also from the child's past. (generational sins)

2006-06-15 01:14:24 · answer #9 · answered by Fire-Dawg 4 · 0 0

you could't teach a scripture that announces purely adults were baptized. There are some that aspect out adults were baptized, certainly, yet no longer to the exclusion of toddlers. opposite for your statement that each and each man or woman in the Bible who were baptized believed first: "And at the same time as she [the rich lady Lydia] replaced into baptized, and her relations individuals, she besought [us]..." Acts 16:15. Her total relations individuals -- little ones, servants and all. similar to Abraham and the circumcision of his total relations individuals, maximum of whom had no say in the remember. that is an illustration of acknowledgement of God's possession. "and that i baptized also the relations individuals of Stephanas:" 1Cor a million:16 . The Church (both Roman Catholic and jap Orthodox) has persevered the practice that it received from the early church, that of baptizing households, and bringing also toddlers into the probability-free practices of the religion. at the same time as the baby is sufficiently previous to pick his own faith, then he's loose to resign his baptism. till then, the probability-free practices of God is upon him. it truly is *no longer* distinct from the way it replaced into executed in the hot testomony, that is an similar! there is no first communion?? you're nevertheless waiting? (Orthodox commune toddlers, so we do no longer have this problem.) Your interpretation of scripture leads you to finish that the mentally impaired won't be able to be kept, when you consider that they could be able to't teach faith in Jesus. Orthodoxy does no longer have this problem, both. advantages. /Orthodox

2016-10-30 22:40:00 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers