i would rather babysit a 2 year old
:)
2006-06-14 10:27:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Definitely infant. At least they sleep now and then.
A 2 yr old is great because they are more stimulating to be around in that they can talk a bit and do little things unlike a dependable infant but there is something to be said for the phrase "terrible two's".
2006-06-14 18:41:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Siggy 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
An infant and a 2 year old are pretty much the same so Ill say a 2 year old.
2006-06-14 17:27:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would much rather babysit an infant, you just have to feed them and change their diapers. You have to run around after a 2-year-old !!!
2006-06-14 19:03:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by bye bye 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depens on how long, if only for 2-3 hours an infint,1-2 hours a two year old
Neither very long
2006-06-14 17:28:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Gilmore_Girl_Fan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Infant. There's nothing more precious to me than a little baby falling asleep in your arms.
2006-06-14 18:10:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jen 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Infants. Two year olds are into everything and have lots of tantrums.
2006-06-14 17:27:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by J 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
infant... 2 year olds can walk and get into things.
2006-06-14 17:28:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
well my friend and i are sitting here reading this question with our two two years that we finally got down for a nap... and we both would suggest infants.
2006-06-14 17:30:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by nelle 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
an infant cuz their so cute and fun to watch and they don't get into everything!
2006-06-14 23:01:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by renae8003 3
·
0⤊
0⤋