So now head lice a macro not a micro creature has evolved a resistance to the most common active ingredient in head lice shampoo will you finally shut up about evolution not being true when it blatantly is true?
2006-06-14 08:44:23 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Samuel J common sense must be something you are lacking in if you think that it hasn't become a different creature because it has as it now has different characteristics. Only a fool believes they appeared in a puff of smoke cause by a big super being in the sky.
2006-06-14 08:51:19 · update #1
they call me... You said you believed in mutations of mutations and so millions of years.
2006-06-14 08:57:39 · update #2
somepersonth... Hay idiot 1 who mentioned god? And 2 if god wanted them to withstand that ingredient why has it killed them for decades.
2006-06-14 08:59:21 · update #3
splinterjah
Now that just made you look stupid didn’t it? Lets re live that moment of stupidity from you "evolution is nothing but a stupid unproven theory. Give up and accept creationism." Yer OK whatever you say.
2006-06-14 09:09:52 · update #4
Noooo! The scourge of the elementary schools will be unstoppable now!
2006-06-14 08:49:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lice haven,t turned into brain succers yet, have they. According to evolution they'ved had millions of years to evolve. I guess they didn't. Are you so blind to the Truth that in your defense of evolution you pick head lice. Immunity is not evolution. Ever heard of a Vaccine?
Hello, brain dead people, evolution is nothing but a stupid unproven theory. Give up and accept creationism. Or you could go for the primoridial alien theory, or what about the easter bunny theory. Hey you frogot about the parrallel universe theory.
How ignorant and blind can a person be. Against All facts and laws, evolutionist refuse to accept God as the creator of the universe.
Charles darwin was raccist, He considered all humans that are not white to be closer to the monkeys and less evolved. Sorry the school has taken that bit of information out of the text book. Survival of the fitest.
What ever. If you want to be that blind go ahead. or the Truth could be yours. Jesus is Truth.
2006-06-14 16:00:24 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Agappae 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Funny, that's called an adaptation. Isn't the head lice still head lice? Its not like it changed into Abougah (or w/e name you want to name a new creature). If evolution was true, we wouldn't be here today.
"To form a blood clot requires twelve specific individual chemical reactions in the blood. If evolution was true, if this twelve-step process didn't happen in the first generation (i.e., if any one of these specific reactions failed to operate in their exact reaction and order), no creatures would have survived. They would have all bled to death!"
- Ray Comfort
Also, you must ask yourself this important question:
Did the first fish that crawled out of the ocean to become a land animal have gills or lungs? If it had gills, it would have died in a few minutes on land. If it had lungs, why did it evolve in the water? The fish has another problem:
It has to find another fish of the opposite gender that happened to crawl out of the water at the same time. If that fish was the only one who decided to crawl onto land, then the new species would die out. Think about it.
2006-06-14 16:07:22 · answer #3 · answered by silverxdust 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is not an example of evolution as the resistant and non-resistant strains are not different species insofar as they can interbreed.
Developing resistances, as a species, is nothing new- humans do it all the time. We become resistant to medications, influenza variations, and more. In a way, life is all about the ongoing battle between organisms and their arch enemies, and trying to defeat each other in a form of chemical combat.
While I am PRO-evolution, I gotta say that this is a horrible arguement for it.
(Oh- 'macro' vs. 'micro' refers to a anti-evolution cop out that some forms of adaptation are NOT evolution, only the 'big' stuff is- so the terms refer more to the size of the adaptation or change than they do to the size of the organism.)
2006-06-14 15:53:17 · answer #4 · answered by Madkins007 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thers a big difference,in a measurable change in the heritable traits,lice still being lice.
than the result in the origin of new species .
Untill I see a dog start turning into a bird I'll have my doubts about complete evolution.
2006-06-14 15:52:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Im sorry but until lice becomes an entirely different creature evolution is not proven.
Resistance to chemicals does not prove changing into different species. Not by a long shot.
Only the foolish believe they are the offspring of monkies and amoeba.
2006-06-14 15:48:46 · answer #6 · answered by Samuel J 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Evolution is true. How do you think God changes things? He just tinkers with DNA a little bit and so be it. That said he also can change things fast like the dig Bang that formed the universe.
2006-06-14 15:54:07 · answer #7 · answered by saintrose 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lol...most bugs can develope a mutation against things like bug killer. just like some peope r born with purple eyes, thats a mutation.....we never said this wuzn't possible. what we find hard to believe iz that a fish can become a horse.
EDIT: I never said i believed in millions of years of mutation, what i meant iz that what u r refering to as proof isn't proof at all.
2006-06-14 15:52:32 · answer #8 · answered by zoooooom!!! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They will ignore this just like they have other proof of evolution. Like the bacteria resistant to the medicine that once killed it.
2006-06-14 15:50:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution is o basic form of life. Most people don't belive in it because is not happening to them but others.
2006-06-14 15:48:15 · answer #10 · answered by divaqueenie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋