I would say neither because majority of both continue to inflict poison into the brains of people across the universe. Relying on people to uplift people has become a thing of the past. It seems everyone is out for themselves.
NOTE: it is practically impossible to be a pimp drug dealer without including violence in the job description.
2006-06-14 07:32:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kenya_7 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I say a spiritual leader....as we Catholics have in Pope Benedict XVI and above that...God is best.
There is no such thing as a non-violent pimp drug dealer because prostitution of women and sale of illegal drugs is NOT non violent...someone always becomes a victim and perhaps even dies as a result.
2006-06-14 07:30:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
genuinely drug broking service. people say they're poisoning the community or killing people yet they did not get those people addicted and addicts are gonna get their drugs from someplace. Even drug sellers have their criteria. No pregnant women people and no youthful ones. real there are some who do not yet maximum do. A pimp will placed all people on the walk. a minimum of in case you promote drugs for a drug broking service you get lots of the money. Prostitutes do not get any.
2016-10-30 21:34:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
"Haven't you had enough of the brute, stupid, childish, and, otherwise, adolescent, exploitative representation of human (or, really, sub-human) existence that is played out daily (in the name, and on the lives, of each and every born human being) by competing governments, politicians, militarists, scientists, technocrats, social planners, educators, exoteric and fundamentalist religionists (who aggressively propagate the provincial, and pharisaical, religions of ego-salvation, rather than practice the universal, and ego-transcending, religion of love), and media hypers (who thrive on the invention and exaggeration of conflict, and dramatically showcase the worst of human instincts in the unending "gotcha" game that denudes and exposes and trivializes and hypocritically mocks the highs, and the inevitable lows, and even the natural ordinariness in the struggling efforts of humankind)? Isn't it evident, in your deepest feeling-psyche, that this Wisdom-renouncing world is being controlled by the worst and most superficial conceptions of existence?
It is now time for every one, and all, to understand themselves, and to reclaim the world from the dictatorship of the ego, and from all of those who play at politics (and life in general) as if it were a sporting event that is supposed to excite and entertain every one on television.
Nuclear disarmament is a relatively positive, but still too superficial and piecemeal, effort. It is not a truly curative means, but only another palliative and temporary move in the midst of mankind's traditional advance toward future trouble. There is something more fundamental than the disarmament politics whereby enemies come to a gentlemanly agreement on how to kill one another without destroying one another! What is more fundamental, necessary, and truly curative is that human beings, individually and collectively, understand and transcend that which is in them that leads them to confront one another as opponents and enemies.
It may sound naive to speak of the necessity for the present (childish, and brutishly adolescent) crowd of governments and institutions to understand themselves and renounce the self-imagery and the techniques of enemies, but the feeling that it is naive to speak in such terms is merely a reflection of egoic frustration and despair. Human beings everywhere must now transcend that very frustration and despair if they are going to prevent the enslavement and destruction of mankind.
Humanity is living in bondage now. Mankind is already, presently, globally, bound to egocentric and materialistic idealisms that are suppressing the human freedom to live by Wisdom and Realize the Truth. If human beings do not shake loose from this regime, they are going to suffer the extreme fulfillment of collective egoic destiny, in a "Narcissistic" holocaust that will either enslave mankind (via a technologically robotized political and social order) or (otherwise) destroy mankind (via technologically engineered warfare).
It is not naive to demand a new leadership when those who are led (and who could make the counter-demand for change) number in the billions. Nor is it folly to try to educate mankind when the only alternative is slavery and death. Therefore, I Say to you: All must commit themselves to understand the patterns by which they are now (and have traditionally been) living (both individually and collectively), so that they can then change those patterns and the destinies those patterns will (otherwise) inevitably inflict upon them."
2006-06-14 07:29:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by soulsearcher 5
·
0⤊
0⤋