when a president declares war he should send one of his loved one to war as well--?

Question

heres the issue if a us president has more the one offspring he should send one to war--- or if need be a nearest relative!!! then when he declares war and sends someone to war he'll feel americas plight for their loved one---and this lame excuse his our president and doesnt have to do this is a cop out!! stand up and be a man about it ---have some honor!!!

ok people heres the point --i'm not juz talking of bush!! i mean any and all future presidents as well--- granted we don't have a draft and to be in the military you have to join-- but do you ? if a president feels its a need to fight outside the us soil --- then send one of his own!!

for those --who missed the entire point to this question let me rephase it !! i would fight in the front lines next to my kids to defend my country and my freedom--you people don't truly understand true honor -- all i hear is bush bush bush--- im talkin about any man who send a person to war should fight as a leader --or a god of war
not some pansy who hides behind the line
look im scared!! i dont want to fight saids the man who is my leader!!!! i have power!!! ha ha what a joke

Answer 1

Okay... You could pick five random answers I've given and figure out just how much love I haven't lost for Bush... but god damn! You agenda people are getting on my last nerve. Did you miss the subtle bus or something? Woohoo... we get it... you don't like the war. Hey, here's an idea! How about asking a pointed question that gets only opinionated responces, dividing your answers into two easily definable groups. Then lets add lots of exclimation points, because that makes everything better!!!!

Answer 2

You ask a question and then tell us how to answer it. That makes no sense. We are not robots or carbon copies of the questioner here. we are all different and our brains are each like finger prints. No, he should not send one of his own, unless we have a draft, then I would understand if he did or had to. But we (luckily) still have a volunteer military. If the Liberals keep it up trying to make people not join then they will be the cause of a draft being reinstated, then their babies will have to go too.

Answer 3

You need to get past the emotional aspect of the war and look at the whole picture. Yeah it does suck that people we love have to go and fight. But fight they must. Would you rather have your loved one blown up in America? You say it could never happen, but why not? They took down the world trade center and part of the pentagon. If we were passive against these attacks they would continue to do them. You have to understand that they burn with a passion for America because of what America stands for. Freedom. It is so easy to blame someone else for your misfortune, but what it comes down to is NO ONE including the President made them sign up for the military. Everyone knows that if you sign up for the military there is a possibility of having to fight.

Answer 4

stand up and be a man - so let someone ELSE fight the war instead of myself?

you aren't really thinking this through clearly. why "punish" george bush's family by drafting his family member(s) into a voluntary military? do the president's family members enjoy fewer civil rights than you do? what part of "sending a loved one to war" makes a person brave?

Answer 5

You're operating under the false pretense that all of us are equally valuable and should be seen as such.

This is not true.

Do you know why capitalism works so well? Capitalism relies on an exploitable labor pool, a pool made up of people who are essentially worth nothing more than what they can physically contribute to those with power. If they were worth more, they'd rise above it all and there'd be no labor pool to be exploited and no capitalism. They'd be "equal."

Those with power make the rules, and those without follow them. Don't go putting those delusional, powerless boxes around those with power. Bush doesn't send his kin to war because he doesn't have to. Even with powerless mooks like you crying yourself to sleep over the "injustice" of it all.

You're like that whining retard cursing the sun for melting your popsicle. "It's not fair!" you cry, but we all know that's the way it is. Grow up, and find a way to maneuver within and around these power structures instead of moping around like your puppy just got run over.

F--kin' toy.

Answer 6

Stereotype a lot? Now that infantrymen are able to confess in the adventure that they are gay, all of us understand there are an poor lot of them, and they are no a lot less heroic in conflict or anti-warfare than immediately infantrymen. would not it stand to reason that except a gay President were elected on an anti-warfare platform, he will be no distinct than a immediately one? as a fashion to adapt with the expectations of their substances, Democrats typically electioneer through affirming they more desirable enlightened and adversarial to warfare than Republicans. yet they commence an poor lot of wars. gay, immediately, Republican, or Democrat, i imagine at the same time as the counselors in the DOD tell the President that pressure is discover out a thanks to get what our us of a needs, all of them say "attack."

Answer 7

first a president should think hard before he declares war because a lot of blood is going to be spilt, it would be a good idea that he should lead the war, like in days of yore, like alexander the great, napoleon,king arthur etc. this will surely make him think twice to settle matters diplomatically as wars of to day are not like wars of gone years we are not dealing with bows and arrows, we are now dealing with nucklear weapons that not only destroy the enemy but the whole world

Answer 8

If you declare war , that Person has to lead his troops from the front not from the rear as they do now. There would be fewer wars.

No one loves himself more than a leader does

Answer 9

There is hidden answer in your question. Brilliant Man!!

Answer 10

Um...maybe because we don't want untrained people carrying weapons? Just a thought.