18 and 69
18^3 & 4 = 5832 & 104976
69^2 & 3 = 4761 & 328509
2006-06-14 03:48:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
By eliminating some numbers such as..0 to 13 may not be because it is university.....and they cant end with 0,1,5,6 because if we cube them the numbers will be repeated.....so, if we take 14^3=2744 so not 14. 17^3=4913 and 17^4=83251 and 1 is repeating here.......18^3=5832, 18^4=104976. so gauss age 18.( from 17 to 22 it is trail and error methos only using calc)
See now the ages should be multiple of 3 and 9 and also the number before them. So, proff age can be from 47 to 99....there fore the possibilities are 48, 53, 54, 57, 62, 63, 69, 72, 78, 84, 87, 89, 93, 98, 99 ( as should be divisible by 3 and 9 and the number before that) in this numbers if i check the square and cube in my calculator i found that 69^2=4761, 69^3=328509. All numbers are there. so proff age is 69.
2006-06-14 05:56:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by sammy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Age of the mathematician Friedrich Gauss must be 32years and that of the Old Professor must be 69years
2006-06-14 04:05:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
2 points
2006-06-14 05:06:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by sparklingsapphireeyes 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
They reject it because they see it as a declare that helps evolutionary biology, and at the same time as it truly is in a fashion real (in the experience that each and each man or woman clinical understand-how builds on what has come till now), understanding and accepting that people are animals would not recommend one has to settle for evolutionary biology. the guy who first categorised people as animals replaced into Swedish taxonomist Carl Linnae (or Carolus Linnaeus, as some jokingly called him) who pioneered the Linnaean gadget of class and nomenclature that biologists nevertheless use at present. Linnae died lengthy till now Charles Darwin replaced into even born, and replaced right into a Christian, and a creationist in fact through default (though no matter if he believed in a smooth Earth is open to talk). as a remember of incontrovertible truth that there only isn't adequate information to signify that people are some thing except a incredibly intelligent species of animal, and there is no shame in that.
2016-10-30 21:14:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
2 points 4 me
2006-06-14 03:31:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by nimish h 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
huh!!?? im on ma summer hols, my brain doesnt respond to maths problems at d mo soz hun!! lol
2006-06-14 03:35:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Marz-2kaii8 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not worth figuring out. i will just take to 2 points. thanks.
2006-06-14 03:39:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by ssig1e 2
·
0⤊
0⤋