Hey what do you guys think was Jesus actually married? or was he in love with Mary Magdeline?

Answer 1

hell yeah he did!there is a picture to proce it too! just see any last supper pictures/painting!just proves that christianity is fake and full of lies, conspiracies and myths1

Answer 2

Do I think Jesus fell in love and married Mary Magdeline? No, I don't. First, the Da Vinci Code gets ALL of its history wrong, and anyone with a library card, or with Google can figure that out.

However, is it completely outside of the realm of possibility? No. There is nothing the Bible says one way or another about whether or not Jesus married. It SEEMS He was single. He definately seemed to have a special affection for Mary Magdaline.

When I read through Paul's reasoning behind being single in 1 Corinthians 7, it seems likely that Jesus would not have married.

Answer 3

Again, like others have said, there is no biblical evidence of this. If Jesus was married, wouldn't at least ONE of the gospel writers note that?

As for the Last Supper painting and the rest of The Da Vinci Code "proof"...... it's FICTION. This book has never been sold in any "Religion" section or even "Philosophy" section of a bookstore, but only in the FICTION section.

Look at that painting any way you want, but there's no proof it's Mary. And to the person who said she's a prostitute, the Church retracted that declaration decades ago. She was never a prostitute, but a devout follower of Christ.

Answer 4

-As has been said, there is no direct evidence of this in history or the bible. That would not preclude such an event even though it is not mentioned. However, paul was very strong in his feelings about women and especially about being single. Paul said he never got any message from God for that philosophy but that he felt that way. Reasoning tells me that Paul would not have been so strong on this subject, and still remain an worthy and respected prophet by the people and by God, if he was speaking aganist marriage when indeed Jesus had been. He would in effect be denouncing Jesus. Paul was a stauch advocant and supporter of Jesus and clearly knew of Jesus' wisdom and his position as the Son of God.

Answer 5

The real answer to the question is "yes"take it for granted!
In fact he married to mary and he loved her very much than his other followers.Hey folks around here in this question The Davinci code book is fiction upto the story of the pursuits,robert langdon and the murders.The author wanted to tell the truth that jesus married to marry on the bases of this fiction story!oh come he write a book that tell only one matter that he married to mary?Thats y he written a bok with the truth the is surrounded by the fictional story!the truth is eternal and there are gospels and documents about this!and the prior of sion is still alive protecting the bloodline!i am sure!

Answer 6

There is no Biblical evidence that Jesus was married, or that he was ever in love with Mary Magdalene. If Jesus ever did fall in love or get married, then it was never mentioned in the Bible, and any thoughts that he might be (as mentioned in The Da Vinci Code, for example) are pure speculation with no evidence to prove it.

Answer 7

The New Testatment doesn't say Jesus was married because it was "understood." An Israelite's first commandment was to be fruitful and multiply. People married very young at that time and men were not considered to be adults until they were married. (The same as Muslims today.) Jesus would have had no following whatsoever if he had not been married. No one would have taken him seriously.

Answer 8

why could'nt jesus be married? He could be man and god at the same time . If he did'nt die on the cross, instead live a healthy long life. What was he to do then? Stay virgin!?? His best friends would prob ask him to procreate anyway. Like create a kingdom of God's children. Then again this is all speculation:)

Answer 9

We really don't know. History is written by victors. If Jesus was married Paul wouldn't allow that information to be known all over the christian world. At the same time who knows? Does it matter?

Answer 10

I think he was gay. No offense please I don't mean it as an insult. I mean he did hang around with a bunch of guys most of the time, didn't he?
But then, the Bible was written not by him but by others many years after his death. It's almost as if we believed every single thing CNN says, or the gossip tabloids right? He was famous, and maybe story writers were the Papparazzi of the era..hehe

Answer 11

NO.
According to Dr. Ron Rhodes

Was Jesus Married To Mary Magdalene?

Dan Brown's Position:

"The marriage of Jesus and Mary Magdalene is part of the historical record." (Page 245)
The Last Supper practically shouts at the viewer that Jesus and Magdalene were a pair." (Page 244)
Based on the Gospel of Philip, Brown asserts that "the companion of the Savior is Mary Magdalene. Christ loved her more than all the disciples and used to kiss her often on her mouth. The rest of the disciples were offended by it and expressed disapproval. They said to him, 'Why do you love her more than all of us?'" (Page 246)

The Truth of the Matter:

There is no mention of Jesus being married prior to the beginning of His three–year ministry. There is no mention of Jesus being married during His three–year ministry. There is no mention of Jesus being married at the crucifixion. There is no mention of Jesus being married at His burial. There is no mention of Jesus being married at His resurrection. In other words, there is no mention of a wife anywhere!

Aside from this deafening silence regarding a wife are theological arguments against Jesus having been married. For example, in 1 Corinthians 9:5 the apostle Paul defends his right to get married if he so chose to do so: "Don't we have the right to take a believing wife along with us, as do the other apostles and the Lord's brothers and Cephas?" Now, if Jesus had been married, surely the apostle Paul would have cited Jesus' marriage as the number one precedent. The fact that he did not mention a wife of Jesus indicates that Jesus was not married.

Some try to argue that since it was expected of every Jewish man to get married, then surely Jesus must have followed custom and gotten married. Such an argument is unconvincing. First, note that a number of major prophets were never married—including the likes of Jeremiah and John the Baptist. Second, note that there were whole communities of Jews which included unmarried men—such as the Essene community at Qumran. Third, note that Jewish leaders often granted exceptions to the general rule of marriage. It was certainly not an unbending requirement, and hence this general requirement does not constitute proof that Jesus must have been married.

Further, we must note that Jesus' marriage is yet future. He will one day marry the "bride of Christ," which is the church. Revelation 19:7-9 tells us:

Let us rejoice and be glad

and give him glory!

For the wedding of the Lamb has come,

and his bride has made herself ready.

Fine linen, bright and clean,

was given her to wear."

(Fine linen stands for the righteous acts of the saints.)


Then the angel said to me, "Write: 'Blessed are those who are invited to the wedding supper of the Lamb!'" And he added, "These are the true words of God."

Clearly, the evidence is against Jesus having gotten married in New Testament times.

Now, Brown's novel claims that a key evidence for Jesus getting married is found in the Gnostic Gospel of Philip. This document, Brown claims, indicates that Mary Magdalene was the companion of Jesus, and Brown says that in the Aramaic, "companion" means "spouse." Hence, Jesus must have been married. Further, Brown notes that this document indicates that Jesus often kissed Mary Magdalene on the mouth.

There are several points to make in response to this. First, the Gospel of Philip nowhere states that Jesus was married. Further, the document dates to about A.D. 275, several hundred years after the canonical gospels. Therefore, it can hardly be considered a reliable source for information about Jesus. Moreover, this gospel was written not in Aramaic, as Brown claims, but in Greek.33 Still further, the manuscript for the Gospel of Philip is not whole. In fact, the document says that "Jesus kissed her often on the ..." and then the manuscript is broken at that point. Brown and others have assumed the missing word must be "mouth," but it could just as easily be "head" or "cheek" or even "hand." There is nothing in the context that demands that Jesus kissed Mary on the mouth. Finally, the Gospel of Philip portrays the disciples of Jesus criticizing Mary because Jesus is said to love her more than all the disciples. However, one must assume that if Jesus was really married, no disciple would criticize Mary. The Gospel of Philip thus provides no hard proof that Jesus was married. Nor do any other "gospels" discovered from the second century and after add support to the claim.

Yet another evidence Dan Brown sets forth for Jesus' alleged marriage is Leonardo Da Vinci's painting of The Last Supper. To Jesus' right, we are told, is Mary Magdalene, not John. While it is true that John looks effeminate in The Last Supper, this is quite in keeping with other paintings by this homosexual artist. Indeed, even John the Baptist was portrayed in a feminine way by Da Vinci. Note that neither John nor John the Baptist have womanly bodies in these paintings