The officer said i weaved on the road. I was on my cell phone and i dont believe i was weaving. He ordered me to get out of my car and I do have a bad back i told him. He gave me the numbers test which i passed on the FST and I believed i passed the A B C test but he said I missed P and Q. I told him I didn't have anything to drink nor did i take any drugs. He still wanted me to go through other test even though i have weakness in my left leg and all. This was all done on a hill as well. I told him i would agree to a breathlyzer test and a blood test. He told me to blow but didn't tell me how hard so i blowed and the top came off. I still agreed to take it again anyway. I blew a 0.00 after telling him i didn't want to take any more test that i was tired he still wanted me to take more test. Then they took me to get my blood drawn and it came out 2 weeks later that no alcohol or drugs of any kind that they tested me for was in my system.
2006-06-13 05:44:10 · 6 answers · asked by kevin K 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
A blood test would supersede a field sobriety test in court. You could have been cited for distracted driving, but you have to BE under the influence to be convicted of a DUI or DWI.
2006-06-13 19:39:35 · answer #1 · answered by zippo 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If the tests came out negative, the officer has no evidence that you were intoxicated, and I can't imagine what court would convict you. He can still get you for weaving and improper lane usage, but this is a lot less serious than a DUI.
2006-06-13 12:48:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most of the time, yes. Usually laws interpret DWI as impairment OF ANY KIND. That means cell phone, fast food, changing the radio station, yammering toddler, whatever. You drove while something was distracting you. People do it all the time, but it's dangerous nonetheless.
2006-06-13 12:49:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the test proved negative then you have nothing to worry about. If you have stopped at I don't want to take anymore tests, they where you could have gotten in trouble. But I wouldn't worry to much about it.
2006-06-13 13:35:28 · answer #4 · answered by Juicy Fruit 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Were you ever arrested? If so you may have a civil action against the city for false arrest.
2006-06-14 23:15:51 · answer #5 · answered by bestanswer 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you don't have anything to worry about
2006-06-13 12:47:55 · answer #6 · answered by BigD 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋