English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://www.picturetrail.com/tebsld

2006-06-13 03:35:51 · 19 answers · asked by Sar 3 in Arts & Humanities Visual Arts Photography

19 answers

I think it is very well done. Color contrast & focus in most pictures is beautifully done. Your still lifes are very nicely done. Your wildlife shots as well. I think all of its very well done. Perhaps work more with natural landscapes. Try a beach scene or two. I believe you could capture that very well. Maybe try some things at dusk rather than early morning. It will dramatically changed what you are looking at & how your piece is interpreted.

2006-06-13 04:57:22 · answer #1 · answered by sun_loving_vamp 1 · 0 3

Honestly? Well, I guess from a commercial stand point they're good. But I've seen hundreds of pictures just like that in stock photography books. I'm being serious too. I think you could be a little more artistic in your image choices and compositions. By artistic in this case I mean, show me something I've seen a million times before (like flowers) and show it in a way as if I'm seeing it for the first time. What seperates you from the rest of the thousands of other photographers doing the same thing?
From a fine art standpoint....I'd say right now your much better at commercial art. But that doesnt mean you couldnt be a good fine artist!

2006-06-13 09:32:59 · answer #2 · answered by syther337 2 · 0 0

Some of the pictures suffer from what is called bulls-eye syndrome -- you have your subject dead centered in the frame.

However, on a number of others you have discovered what a lot of photographers never do -- you don't have to include the whole object in the picture. The shot of the sleeping duck is a good example of that.

2006-06-13 07:05:02 · answer #3 · answered by rt11guru 6 · 0 0

They aren't awful, but they are just pictures. They don't seem to speak to me (tell a story). If you want to get into photography you need to make that your aim.

2006-06-13 04:51:48 · answer #4 · answered by amba 1 · 0 0

You are really talented I study photography too.Do you do your own prints or do you go digital. Anyways good job

2006-06-13 03:39:12 · answer #5 · answered by Lace18 2 · 0 0

Not bad...

Some of them are pretty bland with nothing interesting about them. But one or two really stick out and cause you to go back to them even after you've been through all the other images.

2006-06-13 03:38:04 · answer #6 · answered by Ipshwitz 5 · 0 0

Young and fresh and clean. Your subject choices and compositions will gain sophistication as you shoot more. I would agree that they look like stock photos, but your getting your technique down and that is important.

2006-06-13 20:49:07 · answer #7 · answered by martin b 4 · 0 0

I never saw it. No opinion. Smiddy will not click that link.

oh, ok we took a peek - Smiddy thought, feh! Not bad but we prefer Ansel Adams.

2006-06-13 03:39:32 · answer #8 · answered by Smiddy 5 · 0 0

Its beautiful. You have a great eye for catching things in the right moment!

2006-06-13 03:40:25 · answer #9 · answered by foolnomore2games 6 · 0 0

holy ****.. you are pretty damn good! im impressed.. i wish i were that good a photography.... i really like the one of the running river tihng.. that was it really cool looking.

2006-06-13 03:40:02 · answer #10 · answered by bballbadass246 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers