What evidence is there that the creation story could in-fact be true?

Question

I want real evidence here. Don't tell me "the bible", "the world", or any other generic answer.

What's with all the childish insults? Is it that hard to come up with something concrete?

Child of the Lord: Give me a break. I could just make s... up too. Some guy somewhere said something about evolution being real. That's not really helping my case though.

Answer 1

The only evidence you have is "FAITH". You either believe it or you don't. If you believe it, God will move inside you and He will give you the evidence for your faith. If you don't believe, there is absolutely no evidence that can be brought before your eyes not even if you live from here to eternity.

Answer 2

What evidence is there that the creation could, in fact, be not true? There is no real evidence that evolution of humans is completely conclusive, and it doesn't even answer how life got started anyway. It just somehow spontaneously erupted out of a primordial soup mix? C'mon, that sounds about as crazy as the creation story might sound to you. So, if life and the creation didn't happen the way the scientists say, it must have happened some other way. The creation story is good enough for me.

Answer 3

There is alot of scientific and archeological evidence, the tabernacle that King Herod rebuilt, the bottom stones, remain, only. In the Bible, Jesus stated that "not one stone shall be left on another", The scripture dating to the periods, stating facts consistant with the Bible are in museums.
Also if you look inside your heart you can easily find proof, with faith in the Lord. There is alot of evil going on in the world with terrorists ect., and satan has a hold on these people, you can tell the goodness in other people by the holy spirit they have in them, for accepting Jesus as their savior.

Answer 4

Science says:
“All varieties of man have the same ancestry. This is a conclusion to which all the evidence points. On genetic grounds alone it is virtually impossible to conceive of the varieties of man as having originated separately.”
Anthropologist M. F. Ashley Montagu.

“The Bible story of Adam and Eve, father and mother of the whole human race, told centuries ago the same truth that science has shown today:
that all the peoples of the earth are a single family and have a common origin.”
The Races of Mankind (New York, 1978), Ruth Benedict and Gene Weltfish, p. 3.

“All of us, if we went back far enough, hundreds of generations, would arrive at the same place . . . the evidence of science is that present men derive from a common stock.”
Publication by the Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization of the United Nations.

“Science now corroborates what most great religions have long been preaching:
Human beings of all races are . . . descended from the same first man.”
Heredity in Humans (Philadelphia and New York, 1972), Amram Scheinfeld, p. 238.

“The story of Adam and Eve in the book of Genesis has been vindicated, in part at least, by science. Its main point is now generally accepted as true:
namely, that there is only one human family . . . with a common origin.”

The Bible’s Internal Evidence:
Jesus Christ is recognized as one who held to the highest standards of honesty and morality. If the Genesis account about Adam and Eve is only allegorical, would Jesus have quoted it as actual fact?
At Matthew 19:4,5, Jesus said: ‘Did you not read at that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female and said, “For this reason a man will leave his father and his mother and will stick to his wife”
(A quote of Genesis 1:27; Genesis 2:24)?’

Luke 3:23-38:
“Jesus himself, when he commenced his work, was about thirty years old, being the . . . son of David . . . son of Abraham . . . son of Adam.”
David and Abraham are well-known historical persons.
So is it not reasonable to conclude that Adam was a real person?
If not, where does Luke’s listing of Jesus’ ancestors change over from a mythical person to a real person? Who is the first real man on the list, if not Adam?

Are there links between present life and what went before?
In Charles Darwin’s time such links did not exist. He admitted:
“To the question why we do not find rich fossiliferous deposits belonging to these assumed earliest periods prior to the Cambrian system, I can give no satisfactory answer."
"The Origin Of Species” Page 90

Has the situation changed?
Paleontologist Alfred S. Romer noted Darwin’s statement and wrote:
“Below this Cambrian period, there are vast thicknesses of sediments in which the progenitors of the Cambrian forms would be expected. But we do not find them.
The general picture could reasonably be said to be consistent with the idea of special creation.”
“Darwin And The Fossil Record” Page 466, 467.

Biochemist D. B. Gower comments:
“The story of the fossils agreed with the account of Genesis. In the oldest rocks we did not find a series of fossils covering the gradual changes from the most primitive creatures to developed forms, but rather, developed species suddenly appeared.”
Kentish Times (Dec.11/75) Page 4

Zoologist Harold Coffin concluded:
“On the basis of the facts alone, on the basis of what is actually found, the theory of a sudden creative act in which the major forms of life were established fits best.”
“Evolution Or Creation” Page 12

Answer 5

Well ok there isn't any evidence but

1. they didn't have paper when the world began.

2. it has been admited by scientist that the big bang and evolution are absolutely ridiculous and

Quote: I realize that the big bang and evolution are proposterous but I don't want to accept the existance of a greater being.

Can't remember who said that it was a very well known scientist though

Answer 6

It is Allah Who created the seven heavens and of the earth the same number, the Command descending down through all of them, so that you might know that Allah has power over all things and that Allah encompasses all things in His knowledge. (Qur'an, 65:12)

The information in the above verse is confirmed in scientific sources, wherein it is explained that the Earth consists of seven strata. These, as scientists have identified, are:

1st layer: Lithosphere (water)
2nd layer: Lithosphere (land)
3rd layer: Asthenosphere
4th layer: Upper Mantle
5th layer: Inner Mantle
6th layer: Outer Core
7th layer: Inner Core
http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/scientific_23.html

According to the modern geological definitions the seven layers of atmosphere are as follows:

1. Troposphere
2. Stratosphere
3. Mesosphere
4. Thermosphere
5. Exosphere
6. Ionosphere
7. Magnetosphere

The Qur'an says, "[He] revealed, in every heaven, its own mandate," in Surah Fussilat 12. In other words, Allah is stating that He assigned each heaven its own duty.

http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/scientific_19.html

The Big Bang:
"Do those who disbelieve not see that the heavens and the earth were sewn together and then We unstitched them and that We made from water every living thing? So will they not believe"? (21:30)

Answer 7

The fact that 3,500 years ago the order of creation was stated (albeit in simplistic terms) with what we now observe scientifically:

1) The creation of the universe & laws of physics
2) The forming of the atmosphere
3) The emergence of Land & Plants
4) The fixing/stablizing of the earth's orbit into days/years
5) The creation of sea creatures and birds
6) the creation of animals & man

Answer 8

Modern genetic research is moving toward the conclusion stated in the Bible long ago. By comparing human genetic patterns around the earth, they found clear evidence that all humans have a common ancestor, a source of the DNA of all people who have ever lived, including each of us. In 1988, Newsweek magazine presented those findings in a report entitled “The Search for Adam and Eve.” Those studies were based on a type of mitochondrial DNA, genetic material passed on only by the female. Reports in 1995 about research on male DNA point to the same conclusion—that “there was an ancestral ‘Adam,’ whose genetic material on the [Y] chromosome is common to every man now on earth,” as Time magazine put it. Whether those findings are accurate in every detail or not, they illustrate that the history we find in Genesis is highly credible, being authored by One who was on the scene at the time

Also, some scientists have taken note of the order of events presented in Genesis. For example, noted geologist Wallace Pratt commented: “If I as a geologist were called upon to explain briefly our modern ideas of the origin of the earth and the development of life on it to a simple, pastoral people, such as the tribes to whom the Book of Genesis was addressed, I could hardly do better than follow rather closely much of the language of the first chapter of Genesis.” He also observed that the order as described in Genesis for the origin of the oceans and the emergence of land, as well as for the appearance of marine life, birds, and mammals, is in essence the sequence of the principal divisions of geologic time.

Consider: How did Moses (the writer of Genesis)—thousands of years ago—get that order right if his source of information were not from the Creator and Designer himself?

“

Answer 9

evidence for creation is the evidence against evolution.. ID stuff like biochemical machines that have no way of forming through natural selection, mutation , or adaption.






ps
the bible

Answer 10

All things are created somhow. Can you produce something from nothing? Did your mommy and daddy make you from nothing? Is the bowl you eat your cereal from in the morning made from nothing; how about the milk you put in it? All things have a producer and must be created in some way.
Even the hot air that you blow into the air has a creator.

Answer 11

Read "Case for the Creator" by Lee Strobel. Pretty good scientific arguement/proof for the creation fact.