Yes God himself dictated a sizable chunk of it as a matter of fact.
2006-06-12 02:10:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by DmanLT21 5
·
3⤊
5⤋
From what I know this comes from a book, but the facts from the book do confirm a lot, and I can see a lot of truth in it, take the last supper, if you study it, it clearly looks like a female sitting next to Jesus, and we all know the church has been covering things up, and they are scared, we also know as fact that the bible has been rewritten a number of times, and that man not God profits from it. So you could be right maybe it was inspired by God, because God would not go to one of the Church's, because they would either cover it up, or condemn it, just thing if the Da Vinci was true it would blow them apart as the biggest lot of con-artist known to man, apart form man of course, and of all those out there you have been brainwashed into believing stories told by man written in a book by man, will all say it's rubbish, for two reasons, one their brainwashed, two their scared that all they believe is wrong, they have faith in books written by man, what they should have is faith in God, not a book
Love & Peace.
I must add why do people thik it so wrong that esus could have had a wife, and child, again brainwashed, people need to wake up to the fact that they ahve put their whole fiath in books written by man and MAN alone. Have faith in GOD, not BOOKS
2006-06-12 04:37:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by ringo711 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The first thing to do is verify all the facts with other sources from history. If the facts collaborate, then you may have a point. Although, you'll want to make sure the sources of these facts were writings from eye-witness accounts to the actual events. If there are no writings from eye-witness accounts, then you may run into problems in the translations from the original to now.
I would also strongly recommend the same scrutiny of the Bible. Check out the historical accuracy from eye-witness accounts. It is quite amazing. You see, we know most of our Roman history from Ceasar's Gallic Wars (we don't question the accuracy of these writings), and yet there are only 10 original manuscripts of these writings that we know of, and they were written 1,000 years after the fall of Rome. The New Testament was written within 60-100 years A.D., and we have over 25,000 copies of original manuscripts. So, in the case of the Bible, it is the most well documented (by far) work of antiquity.
2006-06-12 02:24:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by SearchForTruth 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Dan Brown, the author himself, admits that The Da Vinci Code is purely fictional!
2006-06-12 02:10:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by anh51787 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, no, no, no.... The DaVinci code was inspired by idiots and written by stirrers who want to discredit Christianity because they think they'll benefit somehow in some way by doing that, trying to discred Christinality. In other words, the book should have been called "THE DA VINCI CODE"-- by assh_les
2006-06-12 02:13:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you out of your mind? Are you that silly that you'd actually believe everything you hear?
If foolishness like, "Jesus married and had children", was inspired by God then don't you think that the Bible, God Himself and Jesus Christ are just hypocrites, liars that deserve to be exposed?
God is Holy, pure, love, joy and truth. There is no way He is going to inspire a book that is devil accepting. It doesn't make any sense for God to turn against Himself or His Kingdom.
Let's reason together and stop acting like fools please.
2006-06-12 04:33:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by sweetdivine 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope! It's just a book of conspiracy theories based on snippets of truth - IT IS NOT REAL!!! It's a good novel (not written to discredit Christians, you overwrought people, but because Dan Brown is a clever man and knows where people's interest lies) but it's a novel, full stop.
2006-06-12 02:19:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by squimberley 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is not true. Dan Brown thought of this from reading the bible and from his own thoughts as he stated in an interview that he was a person who likes to think of conspiracies.
2006-06-12 02:13:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by devilhunterx2000 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only to the extent that the author loosely used some aspects of the Bible for the storyline.
2006-06-12 02:11:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Listen very carefully, I shall say this only once "IT'S A STORY" just fiction, not anything to do with God.
2006-06-12 02:14:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by sparkleythings_4you 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes that is true. He was credited in both the movie and the film.
2006-06-12 02:11:06
·
answer #11
·
answered by idspudnik 4
·
0⤊
0⤋