Al qaeda is just a make up alley of USA ..... ...in arabic Al qaeda means .." the one who sit down and do nothg .." it is contrary to mujahed which mean " the one who fight int he way of Allah " .... so how could a org ..name itself ..a stupid name ...hahahhaha ...and why would and org ...announce of its attacks on any area before 2-3 days ..so that people could runaway ...... ehehhahahhaha ........... USA we r not blind .....
2006-06-11 22:05:54 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
i don't think it will happen...you get alot of people saying how Binladen especially hates the USA ....don't know why......
2006-06-11 23:23:27 · answer #1 · answered by kida_w 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
very possible, Allah knows better. What we know for sure is that the USA was the country that trained Bin Laden and his men in the first place and sheltered them at the beginning of their terroristic lives!!! Why?!
By the way, 'Al-Qaeda' in Arabic means 'the base' or the 'rule' depending on the context. The meaning you stated is partially correct. 'Al-Qaeda' could be a 'sitting female' (not sitting doing nothing). Do you think they mean this? Why would it be a female?
2006-06-11 22:09:17 · answer #2 · answered by daliaadel 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To me , as an Arab, Al Qaeda means " the base", I do not know where did you get that meaning, it is wrong translation for sure.
Them being alley of USA...well I doubt it.
They could have been penetrated by USA spies to carry certain agenda..possible.
These days I see USA needs no reason to attack a country, they simply would make up any story, and booom , attack, then later they will say, obs, we had wrong information...
Not for long , the punishment will come , sooner or later, then they will cry for a long time.
2006-06-11 22:19:16 · answer #3 · answered by Abdulhaq 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually, "Al Qaeda" means (roughly translated) "The Cult."
Basically, announcing an attack 2-3 days before it actually happens serves as (1) a warning, and (2) a way to give innocent people a chance to get out of there -- they're using attacks as an intimidation to the people and the government, not as a direct way to kill as many people as possible. Otherwise, they'd just do surprise attacks.
2006-06-11 22:09:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am sure that the bush regime were complacent about the attack on 9/11. If not co-conspirators.
You don't have to be a conspiracy theorist or a Micael Moore fan to see that this whole war on terror and war on Iraq has been a desperate grab for oil reserves and pipelines and to increase heroin production in Afghanistan.
Vietnam's got shitloads of oil. Hmm.
2006-06-11 22:21:19 · answer #5 · answered by aussiechic 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Osama bin weighted down became around long earlier we invaded Iraq. i think of Saddam mandatory his clock wiped clean, yet I specific do no longer think of we would desire to coach Iraq into Disneyland middle east. If we invaded each middle jap united states of america that harbored terrorists we would on no account have peace returned. And all our issues in Iraq have not delivered us any closer to getting bin weighted down. i think of the Iraqis might desire to shelter there very own grimy laundry.
2016-12-08 19:43:36 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
stupid usa
2006-06-11 22:08:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think much of lies or conspiracy theories.
2006-06-12 01:22:46 · answer #8 · answered by Daver 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
seems thata way
2006-06-11 22:09:04 · answer #9 · answered by easynow32778 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Um yeah.....
2006-06-11 22:08:07 · answer #10 · answered by harmsaj 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋