Creationists are uneducated.. mostly they go to christian colleges where they only teach biblical verses full of crap... They know none of what you said above... and no christian will love to question the bible, because questions and reasons, prove bible a stupid joke.
2006-06-13 21:33:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Skeptic Instinct 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Explain, in every year of detail, how man has "evolved" from an ameoba in a pool, roaming to and fro from this pool, where this evolution created an ape from several steps, unproven by scientists?
Then, only a certain percentage of these apes manage to change into the current human race, where body structure, DNA, and intelligence mysteriously arrived during these last few centuries.
Then explain to me how man, in creating "better systems and technology," has produced a so called utopian society of freedom where it continues to provide hatred, famines, wars, and deaths...unable to cope with the problems itself created.
1. Does not say how many variations of animals were on the ark.
2. I can't discuss what was not presented in the Bible.
3. If you can prove to me only certain sexes were present when they arrived on the Bible, we can certainly look further into the dilemma.
4. I do not need any theoretical view to descibe any events in the Bible. Truth does not need to be dissected under a microscope to determine its value. Only faith can reveal a true God in all His nature.
People mocked God for building an ark, when it never rained on the earth at that time. Can you explain why?
2006-06-11 23:03:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by n9wff 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here are some questions for you:
Where did the space for the universe come from?
Where did matter come from?
Where did the laws of the universe come from (gravity, inertia, etc.)?
How did matter get so perfectly organized?
Where did the energy come from to do all the organizing?
When, where, why, and how did life come from non-living matter?
When, where, why, and how did life learn to reproduce itself?
With what did the first cell capable of sexual reproduction reproduce?
Why would any plant or animal want to reproduce more of its kind since this would only make more mouths to feed and decrease the chances of survival? (Does the individual have a drive to surviv e, or the species? How do you explain this?)
How can mutations (recombining of the genetic code) create any new, improved varieties? (Recombining English letters will never produce Chinese books.)
Is it possible that similarities in design between different animals prove a common Creator instead of a common ancestor?
Natural selection only works with the genetic information available and tends only to keep a species stable. How would you explain the increasing complexity in the genetic code that must have occ urred if evolution were true?
When, where, why, and how did:
-Single-celled plants become multi-celled? (Where are the two and three-celled intermediates?)
-Single-celled animals evolve?
-Fish change to amphibians?
-Amphibians change to reptiles?
-Reptiles change to birds? (The lungs, bones, eyes, reproductive organs, heart, method of locomotion, body covering, etc., are all very different!)
-How did the intermediate forms live?
When, where, why, how, and from what did:
-Whales evolve?
-Sea horses evolve?
-Bats evolve?
-Eyes evolve?
-Ears evolve?
-Hair, skin, feathers, scales, nails, claws, etc., evolve?
Now on to your questions:
1. Well, even Darwin can agree with this one. Genetic variation is a property of all animals (that reproduce sexually). As more and more offspring came into the world, they began to part ways. Natural selection then occured, and through the animals that went their separate ways began to change through microevolution.
2. Well, if you haven't learned in the text books, interdependence was one of the seven properties of life, as all animals will fall from it. Noah knew that the lions would eat the lambs, thus making the lambs go extinct. Noah took all of the animals that would be in harms way, let them reproduce, and let loose after their was enough, plus, since he loved the animals, he probably kept a few for himself. And who knows, maybe a few of the animals he did release did die? It wouldn't disprove the Bible.
3. I'm not sure what you mean by this, but it is simple of I do understand. The animals could have all came from a reletive ancestor, who produced with its kind to make more. If you didn't know, of some animals, such as K-strategists, there were seven of the kind, not just 2. Anyway, there would be a variety of offspring.
4. There are things that support it. Look at this website:
http://www.drdino.com/articles.php
I would much rather believe in God and find out he is not real than to not live for God and find out he is real.
2006-06-12 11:42:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Adam J 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have an answer for all of it, I'll make it short, many of us are natives god sent being from some other place to earth, they then thru DNA, which we know of that today, but just a few years ago we were not thinking of that DNA anyway they restored the planet and the process started all over, Noah was a gentile, so god sent these being back to earth to restore all races,
Sorry I just can't say anymore
2006-06-11 23:01:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by man of ape 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was not a global flood but local.
Noah’s deluge. To understand you have to start with Gen.6:1.
Gen.6:1 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,
The word “men” is Heb. (ha-adham) means “the man Adam” or his progeny. The word “them” is referring to Adam and Eve. The scripture is talking about Adam and Eve’s clan and not mankind. Mankind a subject for another time.
Gen.6:2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
The term “sons of God” means angels or fallen angels. The word “men” again means Adam and Eve’s progeny or clan. Satan was trying to corrupt God’s plan. That is, from umbilical cord to umbilical cord would come Christ. This is why Eve is called “the mother of all living”.
Gen.6:9 These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God.
The word “perfect” Heb. (tamin) means “without blemish as to breed or pedigree”.
Gen.6:17 And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth, to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and every thing that is in the earth shall die.
The word “earth” Heb. (erets) means “land”, not the whole earth. Besides God says, “to destroy all flesh” in Adam’s clan.
Gen.7:24 And the waters prevailed upon the earth an hundred and fifty days.
Gen.8:11 And the dove came in to him in the evening; and, lo, in her mouth was an olive leaf pluckt off: so Noah knew that the waters were abated from off the earth.
If the entire globe had been under water 150 days, where did this olive leaf (pluckt off) come from.
Gen 9:11 And I will establish my covenant with you; neither shall all flesh be cut off any more by the waters of a flood; neither shall there any more be a flood to destroy the earth.
Remember what God said in Gen.6:17, “to destroy all flesh”. Here God makes a covenant with Noah and his sons. Neither shall all flesh be cut off any more. Neither shall there any more be a flood to destroy the earth. Two floods. One for flesh, Noah’s deluge. One to destroy the earth back in Gen.1:2. The global flood is a subject for another time.
Some consider the plateau of Pamir to be the original Eden. This probably was the homeland of Adam's descendants up until the time of the Flood. Today it’s known as the Tarim Basin or Eastern Turkestan. This region is surrounded by a ridge of very high mountains forming a gigantic basin in the midst of them. It measures 1,000 miles long and is about 350 miles wide.
Ussher’s Chronology says 2348 B.C., Davidson says November 2345 B.C. to November 2344 B.C. for Noah’s deluge.
Records of the Sumerians in Mesopotamia., their King Lists date to about 3350 B.C., and show an ongoing civilization well through the period of the flood. Egypt felt nothing of the deluge, they had an uninterrupted succession of Dynasties. China's civilization during the Yao Dynasty (between 2400 B.C. – 2200 B.C.) with no record of a cataclysmic interruption.
So Noah’s deluge was a local flood. But there was a global flood in Gen.1:2. Study II Pet.3:5-7, Jer.4:23-27.
Psa.104:6 Thou coveredst it with the deep as with a garment: the waters stood above the mountains. Psa.104:7 At thy rebuke they fled; at the voice of thy thunder they hasted away.
Gen 1:6 And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.
2006-06-11 22:52:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i can't answer any of those questions nor do i care to split hairs like that..my belief in GOD is just a matter of common sense to me..the existance called life is not a happenstance in my opinion..i choose to believe that this means something..and it dosen't at physical death..i can't prove any of it but it is not hard for me to conceive that any power that can make this be, is able to deal with beings..whether the descriptions are literal or not..what does it matter in the bigger picture..would those points alone be the determining factor for your belief..or disbelief..just a thought...
2006-06-11 23:00:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by KT 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
1 John 4: 3
And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of anti christ, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is in the world.
2006-06-11 22:52:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by spenderalla33 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only God knows. Be nice. Name calling doesn't get u any where.
2006-06-11 22:56:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Pashur 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
They can't, is to complicated for them. If you believe by faith you don't have, or don't want, explain was is writing on the Bible.
2006-06-11 23:04:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lost. at. Sea. 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can't answer those questions, all I want to know is why that silly sob (Noah) brought various viruses (polio, aids, etc.) with him, and most especially fire ants.
I hate fire ants.
2006-06-11 22:55:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Left the building 7
·
0⤊
0⤋