I'll take $100K a year...Brad Pitt just doesn't do it for me.
2006-06-11 14:07:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by patches8223 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
hmmm too easy .... I would totally take the 100K a year and have sex with someone else, brad pitt is not worth it to me
2006-06-11 21:14:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by sweet77baby 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
100k a year brad pitt creeps me out!
2006-06-11 21:09:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by ozi_nut 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd take $50K a year over Brad Pitt as my sex slave. Please -- he's a cheater! Who needs that? There are too many good looking men out there to pick a cheater.
2006-06-11 21:18:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
easy--I'll take the $100K a year because than I could use income to live a more freer lifestyle, be more of myself, not so concerned with finances--thus, open to meeting the guy who would capture my heart and be more than a sex slave but a lifetime husband/lover/best friend.
2006-06-11 21:16:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by answerb4midnight 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
A) $100k a year. no questions asked
2006-06-11 21:17:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by megan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
a. have you seen brad pitt lately? plus who knows what kind of diseases you can catch from someone who had sex with a blood drinker.
2006-06-11 21:10:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by whatwhatwhat 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Give me the money, sex slaves are easy to find.
2006-06-11 21:07:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by bluechick 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
100K - I don't believe in using people as tools, ie sex
2006-06-11 21:17:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by genuine♥ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
$100K a year
2006-06-11 21:34:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by emmaleigh 2
·
0⤊
0⤋