2006-06-11 11:12:01 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Cars & Transportation ➔ Rail
You will have to wait for the survivors to die and then the family will determine that when the time comes.
2006-06-11 11:20:06 · answer #1 · answered by G 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
You would not need to bury any survivors. This has been going round for ages.
2006-06-11 11:14:55 · answer #2 · answered by butterfly55freedom 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That reminds me of this comedian he is telling this joke. Ron White that is he is on the plane and one of the engines goes out and the person sitting next to him asks how far do you think we will make it. He says all the way to the crash site and I bet we beat the paramedics there by half an hour.
2006-06-18 00:20:24 · answer #3 · answered by twocooldrew 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why bury the living?
2006-06-11 11:16:27 · answer #4 · answered by John H 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd hope not to be on the train and survive - getting buried alive doesn't appeal!!
2006-06-11 11:20:31 · answer #5 · answered by ajes1970 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you wouldn't bury survivors
2006-06-17 08:05:17 · answer #6 · answered by Mr.E.Man 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sad one. no need to bury the survivors. they should bury you alive instead.
just jokin....
2006-06-12 01:33:59 · answer #7 · answered by Giancharno F 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you wait for the oncoming train then there want be any survivors.
2006-06-14 13:31:56 · answer #8 · answered by gail mac 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
everyone know's that the train would be delayed or there would be a problem with the line and everyone would be on coaches.
And people with really old gags would be shot with **** .
2006-06-11 21:09:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wherever the next of kin wants.
2006-06-11 11:15:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋