http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/
2006-06-11 07:47:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by BeachBum 7
·
9⤊
0⤋
I'm not so sure that our immigration policy needs an overhaulling. What I am sure of is that America needs to enforce the current laws and regulations. I think new laws need to be adopted to strengthen or assert the current laws.
We need to ask for citizenship when police interview suspects, we need to end the anchor baby loop hole(starting now or in the future to be humane), and punish severely the employers who lure criminals.
We all need to stand together on this one Rep/Dem/AI/Libertarians.
Democrats should be for the working people of AMERICA first and for most!!!...
2006-06-11 07:51:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Coke&TVdinner 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Enforcement of the ones we have.
Find an orderly way for people (all having a chance if they are not criminals to come in) We need to see that the very poor have a chance too. Maybe a list and go by number. Order will solve many problems along with enforcement of laws for those who break the rules.
No reward or pardon for unlawful entry.
Like your picture icon -good pick
2006-06-11 08:16:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by *** The Earth has Hadenough*** 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Use your Google. There's a lot of links out there if you're looking to read s'more about the whole mess...and it IS a mess, with lots of conflicts-of-interest and money and stuff...it's really funny watching some of the debates that go on about the whole thing, makes you wonder if people ever read the paper, or what paper they DO read when they do....I think it's one of those issues they haven't really dealt with because it's never really been brought up the way it has today. There was controversy about immigration before, during WWII about japan, before that with the chinese, and most recently with Mexico. It's all about politics, and money, and the perception that people are 'getting over' where they shouldn't. Big mess, lots of stupidity, lots of bureaucracy, not a lot of intellectual honesty, big mess. The only way to fix it is to
help countries like Mexico stand up on their own two feet, and find a tie, maybe shine their shoes, and deal with their own problems instead of expecting america to do it for em. I vote in favor of reforming immigration to kind of slow a lot of that down,
kind of think of the population of your neighborhood doubling over about 5 months, think about what that would do in terms of your ability to find/keep a job, etc., how it might positively or negatively affect your income, livability, noise/pollution/crime etc. What kind of world do YOU want to live in? There's 6.5 billion people in the world, do you want them all to move to your house? Hmmm....
2006-06-11 12:42:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by gokart121 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good question,, Policy now seems to be to ignore the problem. There's no disincentive to be "illegal" as an immigrant.
Triningfor Border Patrol Agents seems to be along the lines of "don;t get in the way".
By the way - they're not going to be Border Patrol Agents anymore, they're going to be Border Protection Agents.
That's because they will not patrol the border.
2006-06-11 07:49:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by gabluesmanxlt 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The problem is that it isn't enforced. Border security and enforcement of existing laws, including employer sanctions, would go a long way to fixing the problem. However, big business doesn't want to solve the problem because it wants cheap labor to drive down wages.
2006-06-11 07:46:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by DAR 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
chinese language weren't unlawful immigrants. Please examine right here: chinese language individuals are individuals of chinese language descent. chinese language individuals represent one team of foreign places chinese language and are a subgroup of Asian individuals. the 1st chinese language immigrants arrived in 18c81e728d9d4c2f636f67f89cc14862c0 in accordance to U.S. government records. Fewer than one million,000 arrived earlier the 1848 California Gold Rush which drew the 1st important sort of workers from China who finished menial artwork for the gold prospectors. there have been c81e728d9d4c2f636f67f89cc14862c5,000 immigrants by utilising 185c81e728d9d4c2f636f67f89cc14862c, and a hundred and five,465 by utilising 1880, maximum of whom lived on the West Coast. a important sort of the early immigrants have been youthful adult males with low academic ranges from the Guangdong province.[2] chinese language human beings have been lots of the early immigrants to stay in the U.S. yet then have been banned from emigrating between 1885 and 1965 whilst the ban on Asian immigrants became lifted by utilising the Immigration Reform and administration Act.
2016-12-08 19:30:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The problem Traitors politics ignore about it because dirty politics play game about illegals.
As long kennedy still in senate he just very very liberal just problem for this country because all his clown always be clown, he doest care because he always be rich and low life
so to get change pls click this... to get better
http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/candidates2006.html
2006-06-11 08:12:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You won't find one because there isn't any; immigration policy
that is, or at least one that makes sense.
2006-06-11 08:00:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by booboo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
JUST SUPPORT HOUSE BILL 4437 AND KILL SENATE BILL S2611....THATS SIMPLE !!!
S611 cost $ 30 BILLIONS ONLY FOR BENEFITS ILLEGALS BE LEGALS EVERY YEARS
Read this...
http://biglizards.net/blog/archives/2006/05/the_cost_of_ill.html
AND HOUSE BILL COST $ 10 BILLION BECAUSE ONLY FOR BUILD FENCE AND DOUBLE PATROL
SO which one u like , ship back all ....
2006-06-11 08:25:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋