Is the war that should be fought in Afghanastan vs. the war that Bush failed policies created in Iraq, clouded peoples minds about the original Taliban and Al Qaeda network of Osama bin Laden, rather than the Zarqawi led al-Qaeda movement, since enacting the Bush doctrine?
Zarqawi should be dead, so should Osama bin Laden and the 11 previoulsy most wanted, still not captured or killed that Bush and the DOD presented on their deck of cards, of forgotten years, since the wars began; Wow, it's amazing: do people here in the U.S. really forget with propaganda flying in their face instead of human carnage, who attacked AMERICA?
2006-06-11
06:56:48
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Military
People seem to have forgotten how the Taliban and rebels in Afganistan whipped the butts of the Russians when they tried to capture Afganista. The United states helped the Afganis with intel and arms, and Russia still lost. Bin laden was involved then, we supported him and his fight against the Russians. Bush policies had nothing to do with 9/11, that was a result of failed policies and promises made by Carter and his administration. It just happens that Bush was on duty when Bin laden put his plan into action. It's all about oil. It has always been about oil. Chasing down zarqawi is more for the press and to show the people back home that progress is being made in Iraq. We don't know what is really going on off camera. Zarqawi was self appoined to lead al-quida in Iraq. There have been reports that binladen didn't like him pitting shiites against sunnis and killing other muslims. The question still remains, should we be in iraq? It doesn't matter now, we are there, we need to send more troops, clean up that place and get out. Then send our Iraq troops to Afganistan, and clean house there also, then build that darn pipeline.
2006-06-11 11:51:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Did George Bush or Osama Bin weighted down motive eleventh of September? Bin laden. I've most of the time been expert it was once Bush's fault, considering that I watched films of him with no trouble sitting there as a substitute of doing whatever regarding the airplane aspect, What might men and women have desired for him to have implemented regarding the airplane aspect. Put on a superman customized and fly to NYC to restrict losing each and every individual. George Bush was once at a florida institution with a room stuffed with youngsters while he heard the knowledge of the planes flying into the field trade core. What the hell did guys and females assume the person to do. Will have got to he have began screaming and yelling and run out of the room. You might see the look of quandary on his face while it was once being whispered in his ear what had happened. Bush did the correct factor by way of final calm for the sake of the youngsters. Liberal Hater evidence proves the management knew regarding the attack or was once criminally negligent Then end up it. Let's see this so known as proof. He might've had them shoot the aircraft down. How? George Bush bought understanding "after the planes had crashed" into the trade core. Nobody had any competencies that the planes wherein going to crash into the alternate core till it occurred. Although that they had potential, do you consider it is only that handy to shoot down a airplane stuffed with folks over a town.
2016-09-08 23:40:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by malboeuf 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i heared that someone said that iraq was support Al-Qaida !!
are u kiddin me !!
anyway ... the resistance still controling the south of Afghanastan
the last thing I saw about war in afghanastan was this video
http://www.flurl.com/item/ied_u_146642/
actually there is no way for the US to win the war in Iraq and Afghanastan ...
2006-06-11 07:25:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They don't really matter much, they have very little capability to raise money or plan anything as they are hiding in a secluded backwater part of the world. The real terrorists you have to worry about are already in western europe or america.
2006-06-11 07:01:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Black Sabbath 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I haven't forgotten, I know all too well.
And by the way, Bin Laden is reported to be in Pakistan now, not Afghanistan.
2006-06-11 10:17:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Shep 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush went into Iraq because they were supporting Al-Queida
we're still in afganistan it's just you don't hear about it as much
2006-06-11 07:11:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Danielle 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes osama should have been captured or killed by now, but while he was hiding in a hole iraq was a threat, need to move into iran now, oh well.
2006-06-11 11:10:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Cyrus 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It could be because all went according to plan
2006-06-11 07:04:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by ₦âħí»€G 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think so.
2006-06-16 05:39:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Halle 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
liberal idiots
2006-06-16 06:52:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by ballin 2
·
0⤊
0⤋