2006-06-10 14:30:10 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
He was ******* hebrew.....and i believe me would know, i have a picutre of him hanging above my toilet........
2006-06-10 14:35:09 · update #1
Listen ppl.....im screwing with you....and for all you ppl having a good time, Have a coke and a smile. peace ppl
2006-06-10 14:48:09 · update #2
Well, according to American Standards, one drop of "black blood" makes a person black. Jesus was decended from David through Soloman. Solomans mother, Sheba, was Black, and from the royal family of Sheba, a nation of very dark (and in her case FIONE) people. Therefore, by American standards, Jesus was indeed black. In Revelation, Jesus brother describes him as having "Skin of copper and hair of wool" sounds like a black man to me!!!
(and I'm white BTW)
2006-06-10 14:38:34 · answer #1 · answered by Taliesin7 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
A fact? Do you know what the word "fact" means? Knowledge or information based on real occurrences. Something demonstrated to exist or known to have existed: Genetic engineering is now a fact. That Chaucer was a real person is an undisputed fact.
A real occurrence; an event: had to prove the facts of the case.
A thing that has been done, especially a crime: an accessory before the fact.
Law. The aspect of a case at law comprising events determined by evidence: The jury made a finding of fact.
So no it is not a fact.
2006-06-10 14:40:21 · answer #2 · answered by zionist white devil (pbum) 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just because the thirteenth apostle Rufus who was kept out of the bible because he was a black man said that Jesus was a black man in the movie Dogma (great movie btw) doesn't mean jack ----. That movie was just full of horse manure.
2006-06-10 14:42:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Jesus was a Jew and most Jews are white. He was born a Jew and followed all the laws of the Jewish religion. His followers called him Rabbi. The Last Supper was a Passover Seder.
2006-06-10 14:34:18 · answer #4 · answered by notyou311 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It doesn't matter, but he was a Jewish man, and in that time most or really all Jewish men had dark hair and eyes but lighter skin not pail but not black a good tan all year long **lol.** Hope this helps :)
2006-06-10 14:35:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but he would have looked like a Jewish man from the Middle East, not light brown hair or blue eyes.
2006-06-10 14:33:06 · answer #6 · answered by keri gee 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hebrews were/are not black, idiot. What in the hell is a picutre, that French?
2006-06-10 14:38:30 · answer #7 · answered by Mr.Wise 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Although I can plainly deny your acceptance of discrimination as a form of prayer, i can also ellaborate that there is much more going on here than you have or even are able to verbalize
2006-06-10 14:33:16 · answer #8 · answered by gekim784l 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was probably very darkly complected. People from that part of the world generally are.
2006-06-10 14:33:10 · answer #9 · answered by bc_munkee 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He may have been dark-skinned as most people are from that region, but he was not of African descent.
2006-06-10 14:35:57 · answer #10 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋