Who actually believes the da vinchi code is true or do they believe the passion of the christ is true?

Question

I watched the passion and I thought about it was okay I believe but then there is the da vinchi code so which is true.

Answer 1

Both of these examples are MOVIES, do some research on the historical fact behind Jesus, and the facts behind the Da Vinci Code, then make up your mind.

Answer 2

The Bible is the true and accurate Word of God.

The Passion of the Christ is an accurate description of the crucifixion of Christ. Remember, the word passion refers to the depth of Christ's love for us, i.e., the sufferings of Jesus in the period following the Last Supper and including the Crucifixion, as related in the New Testament. Passion (noun) A powerful emotion, such as love, joy, hatred, or anger.

The Da Vinci Code is pure fiction, which is stated as such by the author, Dan Brown.

Nowhere in the Bible does it even hint that Jesus married Mary Magdalene or anyone else. His passion for us was so strong that His sole purpose for being on earth was to provide us with salvation and a way to go to heaven.

Answer 3

The Da Vinci Code is interesting fiction but is almost completely inaccurate.

The Passion of the Christ is a movie, an artistic interpretation, of the real event of the Passion and Death of Jesus Christ as described in the Gospels.

With love in Christ.

Answer 4

I believe the Passion was a fair and accurate film based on the Bible, which is the Word of God/
I believe the bible is true. Everything else has a some errors in it.

Answer 5

Dude........
The Passion of the Christ is true beyond doubt.It potrays the passion of our Lord Jesus Christ which is true and has happened 2000years ago.

Whereas the Da Vinci Code is purely rubbish & nonsense.
It is better not see such movies or read such books.

Answer 6

i don't think that either are true. as i see it, Jesus was just a lunatic claiming to be the son of god, born to a woman who cheated on her husband before they ever had a sexual experience. he traveled around spreading his "holy words of wisdom" and the Romans obviously felt threatened by the teachings of this man whose viral ideas were spreading around so they did the only logical thing, try to eliminate him and eradicate the faith that he promoted. so they did. but his ideals didn't die and were maximized after his death, this crazy man had such an influence on his followers that even today we measure time according to his alleged birth.

i think that chances are that John, as any other responsible Jewish father would have made sure that his son got a wife and lived a normal Jewish life as probably a carpenter. the chances of there still be a direct genealogical connection(bloodline) to Jesus is incredibly small.

the da vinci code is an incredibly entertaining novel but i don't think constitutes and accurate account of history, besides, how true do you think is what we know of Jesus two millennia after he died and so many have used to and adapted it for political and religious control?

Answer 7

both are movies, the Truth is discovered in the Bible itself, not in a HOllywood version. The Passion is based on the Bible, but has some man-made ideas in it, the Davinci code is based on agnostic ideas and is fictional. YOU read the Bible and YOU discover God's truth for YOUrself, it is His personal letter to YOU because He loves YOU. Man will always have his opinions, but isn't eternal security to heavy an issue to leave to opinion?

Answer 8

I believe the Passion was a fair and accurate film based on the Bible, which is the Word of God/

Answer 9

the passion of christ was based on the book of luke in the new testament,,,, i dont believe the code has any biblic backing

Answer 10

Since the church was established in Rome (only for politics reasons), the Christian church has been hiding evidence of the real life of Jesus, and what his real message was.

There is a loot of books that were in the original bible that were taken out of it because they were prejudicial to the church. One of them was a book that a woman wrote talking about revenge and death penalty. It was in the bible until somebody though that it was prejudicial to the church interest. However, it was one of the original books in the bible.