You just can't stop. Why are you trying to get folks to think. Some where someone is asking their preacher to explain that and the preacher hasn't got a clue. He now has to re-intrepret a verse somewhere to explain it. You have it correct , I am in your corner.Shalom and Shalom
2006-06-10 08:20:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
We live according to the standards he put forth in the beattitudes, Matthew Chapter 5, and other standards he gave in the subsequent chapters 6-7. We also live by the ten commandments, but not the myriad laws that the pharisees themselves made up in the 400 years before Jesus' birth, because those arent God-given laws.
2006-06-10 15:22:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Spartacus 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no contradiction. Jesus before he was crucified lived by the jewish traditional law. The law required a blood sacrifice in order to remit sins and Jesus was the FINAL sacrifice (like a lamb he was lead to slaughter). One does not live under law and grace at the same time. It is either the law which tends to convict and condemn the spirit; or one lives by the power of grace alive unto God for all eternity. One cannot serve two masters.... a person is either lost (living under the law) or saved (living under grace).
2006-06-10 15:21:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lady Di-USA 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Discussing the bible is really pointless because it is a book of mythology and is similar to a Superman comic book.
But, if one takes it literally and historically accurate, Jesus was a Jewish rabbi who followed Hebrew law (Law of Moses).
Jesus would not recognize a "Christian" church service or "Christian" practices if he suddenly reappeared because he never advocated people could or should ignore the Law of Moses.
People who actually follow Jesus would be attending synagogues and complying with the Law of Moses, they would not be sitting in churches listening to some windbag tell them their sins were all forgiven.
The Roman Empire invented Paul so they could justify converting pagans to Rome's brand new Universal religion. Christianity is not Christian, it is Paulist and pagan.
But, it's all nonsense.
2006-06-10 15:27:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Left the building 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. We're well aware He is the King of the Jews.
Replacement theology is wrong.
The Gentiles have been grafted onto the "family tree" but the Jews are still the chosen people.
No I'm not a Jew and no I have no problem with it.
In the family of Christ we're all one.
I won't quote scripture because some folks in here lose their minds when we do. Check the link below.
2006-06-10 15:33:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by NickofTyme 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
this human sacrafice thing is NOT jewish
the roman crusified over 100,000
i think peter just wanted a bit of fame so created the whole christ thing
it was not really popular until emperor constantine made it official
G-d did ask abraham to raise up his son as a sacrafice as a test
the words (check out the original hebrew) is raise up NOT kill
and 1 man's death should not exempt others frm the doing the commandments
i doubt jesus (a jewishguy )intended to create a whole new religion
if he knew he'd probably be ticked off!
2006-06-11 13:18:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by kathyt11232 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If the bible did not have any truth in it. Why aren't we going out killing people and getting away with it. Jesus was born in Israel and yes he is jewish, but it does not matter what nationality he is. It's the purpose of his existance. Yes, Jesus kept the true Sabbath which is Saturday. He did not eat unclean meats. He lived in poverty eating bread and drinking water. He gave up his Royalty of divinity to save sinners like you and I. Respect.
2006-06-10 15:39:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by ANDREW G 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO he did not. You didn't read the book did you? He healed on the sabbath, he ate with the sinners, he drank with the tax collectors,he ate with unclean hands.
2006-06-10 15:48:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tommy G. 5
·
0⤊
0⤋