correct me if im wrong on evolution:?

Question

is this the foundation of evolution:

i evolved from nothing into an exploding rock
i evolved from a cooled rock into a cell
i evolved from that cell into a monkey man.

if i look up my name on ancestor.com will it say:
nothing>rock>cell>monkey thing

infallible?

what is your proof for evolution anyway.. ill look at the link you send me. im interested. i want real proof not just isolated incidents of adaption. show me the thing that made you believe the evolution is true beyond a shadow of a doubt. thanks

Answer 1

Sir Arthur Keith (Evolution Expert) himself said it best: "Evolution is unproved and unprovable. We [evolutionists] believe it because the only alternative is special creation [God], and that is unthinkable."

What proof do we have of evolution? None at all. One responder said you were "simplistic"...another cited the "proof" of amino acids. Any honest/knowledgeable inquirer would recognise that those were VERY simplistic answers. He wrote "Next comes single cells...". Wow! That was an easy transition...and where/how does he maintain the possibility of that? Those do nothing to support their theory, but I guess its all they've got.

While we struggle to find the elusive "missing link", in reality there are missing links between every species. How does DNA suddenly decide to produce something other than it is programmed for? Where did those first single celled creatures come from? Where did the matter for the "big bang" come from?

There is no proof that you are reading this letter as a result of an explosion 14 billion years ago. The evolutionist accepts that origin by "faith", just as the believer accepts our Creator by faith. However, the current scientific evidence does not support evolutionary theory, rather, it refutes it. Why does is live on? Because in the effort to find the origin of life outside of God, its all they've got.

Answer 2

No in the early sea there was all the components of a cell and as conditions where right a cell formed. Now as conditions changed the cell needed to change too in order to stay alive and to give it an advantage over other cells so it evolved. Then to overcome some obstacle 2 or more of these cells joined together creating the 1st multicellular life form which then carried on evolving as conditions changed to give it an advantage. That is where we came from. Now proof some of the masses of proof for evolution. I have here 2 fossils one is older than the other but both are different types of ammonites. One of them (the older one) is flat it has a shell that is coiled up with 3 coils and it coils into it's self in the middle. The other one same 3 coils same type of shell only instead of coiling into the middle it coils out wards towards you forming a cone shape. This 2nd fossil evolved from the 1st. There are thousands of fossils that show evolution. Also If you expose a bacteria to antibiotics but don't kill it it develops a resistance to thees antibiotics and it passes this resistance on to it's offspring so the next time these bacteria get exposed to antibiotics the ones without the Resistance die out but the ones with the resistance stay alive and so have evolved into a new species of bacteria. Now prove creation.

Answer 3

Are you actually going to listen? Evolution is a change of alelle frequencies in a population over time. It is undeniable that this happens. If you've had a child, you've proven evolution. If you see a child, you've seen proof of evolution. If you've seen anything that is or was alive, you've had proof.
Your strawman argument is false because you involve elements in your description of evolution that are not part of evolution itself. Biological evolution has nothing to do with the origin of the universe or the origin of life. You must first have something capable of passing on it's genetic material before evolution can come into play. So, in all of your argument above, the only part that actually can be said to be at least partially correct about evolution is the very last statement where you say "i evolved from that cell into a monkey-man."

Answer 4

So, what is your proof,

God -> man

Earth created in 6000 years, and lets all wait for armageddon, and sooner the better?

Science including evolution is a hard, and it takes effort to work this through. Offcourse, all of us can close our eyes, and believe that god created man in his image, and be done with it huh?

There are several proven observations about evolution - like the island effect - dwarfism among animals, then recently, there is proof that environmental changes change genetics. All these point to some aspects of evolution - that it happens.

Offcourse, 'life' cannot be yet created in a lab, from primordial conditions, but that still doesnt proove any 'god' created life.

So, wait around, maybe in a few 100 or 1000 years, you'll have your proof of evolution.

Answer 5

NO NO NO.....that is not evolution...do some real research on the topic. Contrary to some beliefs, man has not been on earth since the creation of it over some 5 billion years ago. Evolution is the common descent of all organisms from a single ancestor or ancestral gene pool Ex. Viruses evolve all the time..into stronger strains (Influenza)

Answer 6

Actually, when the earth was newly formed a long long time ago in a galaxy...well...the one we're in.....

There were lots of elements floating around in the atmosphere from all the chaos. Clouds of gasses were moving all over the planet and there ws lots of static discharge from this movement. We call it lightning. In some places, the right elements happened to be floating near each other and got hit in the same bolt of lightning. These elements formed the first amino acids - the building blocks of cell proteins.

By the way, this event has been SUCCESSFULLY simulated in a lab. Next comes single cells and over the coarse of billions of years, they began to evolve to adapt to their changing environment.

Oh yeah...this is sooo much harder to believe than a virgin having a baby who died and came back from the dead. Or better yet, that we were created from dirt by magic.

Answer 7

In 1936 Aleksandr Ivanovich Oparin, in his "The Origin of Life on Earth", demonstrated that organic molecules could be created in an oxygen-less atmosphere, through the action of sunlight. These molecules, combine in ever-more complex fashion until they are dissolved into a coacervate droplet. These droplets could then "grow" by fusion with other droplets, "reproduce" through fission into daughter droplets, and so have a primitive metabolism in which those factors which promote "cell integrity" survive, and those that don't become extinct.

Around the same time J. B. S. Haldane suggested that the earth's pre-biotic oceans - very different from their modern counterparts - would have formed a "hot dilute soup" in which organic compounds, the building blocks of life, could have formed. This idea was called biopoiesis or biopoesis, the process of living matter evolving from self-replicating but nonliving molecules.

In 1953, taking their cue from Oparin and Haldane, the chemists Stanley L. Miller and Harold C. Urey carried out an experiment on the "primeval soup". Within two weeks organic amino acids, the basic building blocks of life, had formed. While Miller and Urey did not actually create life; they demonstrated that a more complex molecule — the amino-acids — could emerge spontaneously from simpler chemicals, in the presence of an external energy source in an atmosphere largely devoid of oxygen (the experiment involved shooting a spark, representing lightning, into their flask of supposedly primitive earth-gases).

Abiogenesis is used to refer to theories about the chemical origin of life, such as from a primordial sea, and most probably through a number of intermediate steps, such as non-living but self-replicating molecules (biopoiesis).

Also, origin of life has been explained clearly in this web-site -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_life

And lastly, I have yet to see a miracle to believe in (intelligent) creationism.

Answer 8

We continually give you proof and you ignore it. Just like the millions of times we explain that humans didn't evolve from monkeys. Or like how we explained that it was not a rock that created the universal ancestor (http://www.chem.duke.edu/~jds/cruise_chem/Exobiology/miller.html ). If you're going to be ignorant to the facts, then why explain it to you. Micro-evolution (adaptation) is a fact, what's to stop organisms from evolving from one species to another, given the vast amount of time they had to evolve.

Answer 9

That's the whole thing- Evolution takes much more faith to believe than the bible. There is no proof. But there is proof that the bible was written over the course of millenniums.

Answer 10

Correct me if I am wrong on creationism ?
A supreme being magically turned some dirt into a man.
This supreme being then used one of the man's ribs to make a woman.

Compare that to what you wrote about evolution ( which is highly uninformed ) and see which one sounds crazier.