lmao!!!! Good one!!!
2006-06-10 23:55:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by itty 7
·
5⤊
2⤋
I would love to take a class in intelligent design for college credit. The professer would say " Yes, there is a God, and he created everything." Class dismissed. It would be an easy three credits, but not very intellectually challenging.
2006-06-11 00:18:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why so you have a pic of George W. Bush as your avatar?
EDIT:
justnanous, you appear to have some of your facts mixed up...
1) Macroevolutionary theories DO NOT state that ancestor species die out after speciation occurs. The following is from "Answers in Genesis", a leading creationist website.
"‘If we evolved from apes, why are there still apes today?’ In response to this statement, some evolutionists point out that they don’t believe that we descended from apes, but that apes and humans share a common ancestor. However, the evolutionary paleontologist G.G. Simpson had no time for this ‘pussyfooting’, as he called it. He said, ‘In fact, that earlier ancestor would certainly be called an ape or monkey in popular speech by anyone who saw it. Since the terms ape and monkey are defined by popular usage, man’s ancestors were apes or monkeys (or successively both). It is pusillanimous [mean-spirited] if not dishonest for an informed investigator to say otherwise.’
However, the main point against this statement is that many evolutionists believe that a small group of creatures split off from the main group and became reproductively isolated from the main large population, and that most change happened in the small group which can lead to allopatric speciation (a geographically isolated population forming a new species). So there's nothing in evolutionary theory that requires the main group to become extinct.
It’s important to note that allopatric speciation is not the sole property of evolutionists—creationists believe that most human variation occurred after small groups became isolated (but not speciated) at Babel, while Adam and Eve probably had mid-brown skin color. The quoted erroneous statement is analogous to saying ‘If all people groups came from Adam and Eve, then why are mid-brown people still alive today?’"
2) A theory is not just an idea. An idea is an idea. A theory is a set of ideas, substantiated by facts and measurements and conforming to known natural laws, that explains a natural phenomenon. Other theories that are "just theories": the Theory of Heliocentric Motion (explains how the planets revolve around the sun), the Theory of Relativity (allowed us to discover nuclear power), and the Theory of Induction (explains how electromagnets work), and the Theory of Gravity (no explanation needed). The first link below has more information about this.
3. Darwin said no such thing in his book. The last paragraph of the last chapter of "On the Origin of Species" reads:
"It is interesting to contemplate an entangled bank, clothed with many plants of many kinds, with birds singing on the bushes, with various insects flitting about, and with worms crawling through the damp earth, and to reflect that these elaborately constructed forms, so different from each other, and dependent on each other in so complex a manner, have all been produced by laws acting around us. These laws, taken in the largest sense, being Growth with Reproduction; Inheritance which is almost implied by reproduction; Variability from the indirect and direct action of the external conditions of life, and from use and disuse; a Ratio of Increase so high as to lead to a Struggle for Life, and as a consequence to Natural Selection, entailing Divergence of Character and the Extinction of less-improved forms. Thus, from the war of nature, from famine and death, the most exalted object which we are capable of conceiving, namely, the production of the higher animals, directly follows. There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved."
Not a word about faith in there. If you'd like to read the entire book (it may help correct some misunderstandings), it's available online. Just click on the second link.
2006-06-10 07:28:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by marbledog 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
evolution? im willing to give it a go, ive always wanted an opposable thumb myself. looked on e bay but no luck.
throwing poo jayslug ,brings back horrible memories of my time at handsworth grammar school for boys in birmingham,latin teachers are twisted pendejos . im sure theres a law against it
2006-06-10 08:51:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Monkey boy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
they will if they loose their bananas to their cousins at the zoo...lol.
IF evolution is true...then why are there still primates ??? The old species is SUPPOSED to die off according to what Darwin wrote in HIS book..
BTW :: A THEORY is just someones ideas...even Darwin states in the last paragraph in the last chapter of HIS book "You'd have to have more faith to believe this theory ,than to believe in God"....HHhhhhhmmmmm.....????? He doubts himself and his crazy notions..but made monkeys out of a lot of people didn't he!!!
2006-06-10 07:30:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by justnanous 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Skepticized - best answer I've yet to see on yahoo answers !
Outside of that this "question" deserves no answer so I wont give one .
2006-06-10 07:36:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by shellers 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its almost night here actually... or you probably think earth is flat and there is a day everywhere at this moment. You stupid christian.
F
u
c
k
Y
o
u
.
2006-06-10 07:23:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
wow.....how funny.....what a stream of intelligence......apparently your
neuron went through a real challenge spelling this......
it's evolutionists- plural....keep that in mind
2006-06-10 07:28:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by oana 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
someone should rapidly evolve into a huge mickey mouse glove and ***** slap this guy.
2006-06-10 07:22:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
lol. ok, so god make a black adam and eve, a white adam and eve, a hispanic adam and eve, an asian adam an eve, a middle eastern adam and eve? and so on?
you can't challenge something proven over and over
2006-06-10 07:25:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by Wilochka 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Sure monkeynuts.
2006-06-10 07:22:59
·
answer #11
·
answered by Awesome Bill 7
·
0⤊
0⤋