As it was ok to shoot men for saying they were frightened in the first world war then is it ok to shoot both sexes? Is it ok to shoot women for being frightened too? Or was it wrong to shoot men?
The question was posed to expose society's utter hypocrisy and hatred of men.
And don't say that men somehow deserve it because they weren't brave or something. Just turn that around and say that it should be done on both sexes. Women too. So women, as well as men, should be shot for being frightened? This has to but put in simple terms- so women should be shot for being frightened. That puts it in context, but how does it look now?
Frightened women shot.
Frightened men shot.
Don't be sexist.
Welcome_to_How_Things_WILL_Be
2006-06-10 00:08:24 · 5 answers · asked by welcome_to_how_things_will_be 3 in Education & Reference ➔ Financial Aid
Murder is evil, therefore anyone who commits murder is evil, therefore the government is evil.
2006-06-10 00:13:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is definitely wrong to shoot men or women, for being afraid of the unknown which is inherent in mankind in general. The unknown is what men in the first world war faced as alot of them were not more than older kids...16,17 and it is abhorrent that such a thing should take place.
2006-06-10 01:08:13 · answer #2 · answered by bigjimmyguy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was wrong for men to be shot therefore it would be wrong to shoot women.
2006-06-10 00:12:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anne M 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
this seems to be a philosophical question
2006-06-10 15:21:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
and it hurt none - do as ye will
2006-06-10 02:34:18 · answer #5 · answered by jyd9999 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋