English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-06-09 21:25:57 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Gender Studies

12 answers

Interesting question!! I have added your question to my watch list.

2006-06-09 21:27:30 · answer #1 · answered by wonderme 4 · 0 1

It's not a question of if they're better or not. I personally think that the uncircumcised look is not attractive. The foreskin, however, has extra nerve endings in it that allows the male to feel more stimulation, so in a way, it might make the sex better in general. Be cool, wrap your tool.

On second thought after reading 3 ladies unaminous opions, I might sit corrected. Dam!

2006-06-09 21:28:32 · answer #2 · answered by Fat Guy 5 · 0 0

Your question suggests one point very clearly that circumcised men feel good on the bed. I can assure you that uncircumcised men are still better.
Sex is a natural act with the help of natural organs; why to disfigure it in the name of deriving more sexual pleasure? These are all blind practises with people in Semitic culture started at a time when they were nomadic and sex with women was the only bi-sexual pleasure. By placing it in the religious scriptures they have immunised it against reforms with passage of time and progress in science, which is extremely unfortunate.
It is like removing lips in the female sex and claim that the initial obstructions are removed to maximise sexual pleasure and its duration. Abraham circumcised his sons because he was afraid that his sons may also delay fatherhood like him who fathered Ismail when he was 90 plus and Issac when nearing 100 years.
The Jews who are supposed to be more enlightened than the Muslims also do it without questioning the rationale behind circumcision. We forget that what nature has designed is far superior to what man can alter by artifice.

2006-06-09 21:52:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I have had both and my current boyfriend is uncircumcised and he gives me orgasms(great ones at that) whereas other men who were circumcised did not. So my opinion is that uncircumcised men are better in bed.

2006-06-09 21:50:40 · answer #4 · answered by Isabella's Mommy Expecting #2 6 · 0 0

We sure are. I don't understand what's so different. Do women prefer those who are cut? We bathe and keep care of ourselves. The tool is the same, it just has a wrapper on it. It all works the same doesn't it? If you asked my wife, she would tell you I'm fabulous. She hasn't had experience with anyone but me so I'm lucky and so is she!!!

2006-06-09 21:28:45 · answer #5 · answered by Obi-wan Kenobi 4 · 0 0

I wasn't circumsized until I was 15 and I don't think it makes a difference in sexual performance. Its just more hygenic to be circumsized because bacteria doesn't collect in the excess skin.

2006-06-09 21:29:12 · answer #6 · answered by disorder74 3 · 0 0

In my experience the answer is Yes they are just as good but sometimes they orgasm a little faster....

2006-06-10 02:39:39 · answer #7 · answered by Just Thinking 6 · 0 0

Yes, and sometimes better.

2006-06-10 03:23:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, they are.

2006-06-09 21:28:14 · answer #9 · answered by Kay G 2 · 0 0

yeah

2006-06-09 21:27:13 · answer #10 · answered by jaantoo1 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers