English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

now- a- days, there is a trend that both the parties desiring to marry each other, should undergo test for finding out , that they are not hiv positive, and if they are, the other party has the right to cancel the marriage. will it be better than getting infected for hiv innocently, and ruining your entire life afterwards?

2006-06-09 20:53:21 · 4 answers · asked by palador 4 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

4 answers

I think its a good idea to be tested especailly before you have unprotected sex with anyone, it would be horrible to give someone you love AIDs. Its terrible to give someone you dont love AIDs. Its a easy test. more people should get the test.

2006-06-09 20:59:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Yes, in Oklahoma we still have the sylphs test I think the Aids test is just as important.

2006-06-09 20:56:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

YES! Otherwise your putting on a ring of death sentence.

2006-06-09 20:57:40 · answer #3 · answered by race21 3 · 0 0

yes

2006-06-09 21:08:22 · answer #4 · answered by purplepoppyfigs 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers