I'm against it. There is no benefit, and once its gone you can't get it back. So if you are considering it, read up about it, check out views from doctors and women who have been through it. In some cultures they not only cut the clitoris the sew up the Virgina leaving a very small gap for menstruation and urine and when they get these women married guess what? The man forces himself through those stitches. Other cultures use the same blade and these women end up contracting diseases like AIDS. It's an evil act and it should be banned.
2006-06-10 00:21:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by buttercup 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Beautiful is alittle confused there. Men are circumcised everday without their permission (usually happens a few hours after birth at the request of the parents). I'm totally against this for woman but have to say that it happend more often to men.
Oh yeah, Beautiful, woman still get pregnant from Female Mutilation they just loose all feeling of stimulation down there. This also goes a long way to prove that the infamous G-Spot is not as all powerful as stated because if it were then the clitoris could be removed and woman could still rely on their G-Spot.
2006-06-10 00:26:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by GrimmyBear 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ouch! Against! None! Look up a female circumcision website and read up. Cultures that practice this are abusing children, some as young as 5 years old. Of course if you had cancer there or some other health problem warranting this, it would have to be considered I guess.
2006-06-09 20:19:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by ginarene71 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's a barbaric act to put a young female through... it is also illegal in the UK that is why most young females are shipped off to wherever they come from for it to be done. According to their beliefs it is to guarantee a female remains a virgin till her wedding day.......they also sew her up so tight sometimes she finds it difficult to pee! Guys how you fancy having your rod stitched up so you can't pee? Not a lot of fun huh?
2006-06-10 11:45:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by lollipoppett2005 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sounds like an abomination.
2006-06-10 14:46:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Little Wifey 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Against it.
It is no fun to have sex without this bit coz then you do not enjoy as well as you should,infect you shoul enjoy as much as your partner dose so do not do it.
2006-06-09 20:12:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by tash 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'll tell you! You'll never be sexually satisfied again! You'll be depressed! And you'll probably kill yourself and the person who did it to you! How magical!
2006-06-09 20:11:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by aristocrat1.0@sbcglobal.net 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do you have one?
2006-06-10 14:55:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by peppermint_paddy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
against... what if men had to have their scrotum removed to keep people from getting pregnant would you do it?
2006-06-09 23:46:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
that is a horrible thing to do to a woman, i have seen shows about it and the pain these women go through.those countries that do it to those young girls should be,well i have no words.AGAINST IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-06-09 20:16:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by greeneyes634970 4
·
1⤊
0⤋