English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9/11

2006-06-09 19:02:43 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Look, folks, lets all get a grip and quit going to those conspiracy sites. I firmly believe that 9/11 was just the cold hard truth, Islamic extremists boarded those planes, hijacked them, and then crashed them into their intended targets, minus United 93. It is true that the planes themselves didn't bring the towers down, the FIRE did. When the planes hit, they knocked off the thin layer of fireproofing material that was sprayed onto the frame of the building. The jet fuel within the planes only burned for the first 10 minutes of the fire, then add office building materials such as paper and wooden desks, etc, and you have a HOT fire. Not hot enough to melt steel, but hot enought to weaken it enough so it breaks. Then a pancake effect occurs, and the floors below are not strong enought to support the weight. There was nothing controlled about it. Pull your head out of the ground and stop listening to mommas boys who live in their basement and write this crap, instead honor the victims!

2006-06-09 19:08:24 · update #1

Yes, they were made to withstand a direct hit from the largest available aircraft at the time..a Boeing 727...right, and a 757 and 767 hit the towers..there's a little bit of a size difference there. Oh, and did you know that the planes were carrying a full load of fuel? Yes, they DO love to top it off before those long hauls if ya get my drift.

2006-06-09 19:47:14 · update #2

http://www.publiceye.org/conspire/Post911/dubious_claims/web_010911-N-6157F-001.jpg

2006-06-09 19:51:06 · update #3

Human DNA remains from American 77 (N644AA) were recovered from the ruins of the Pentagon. The only passenger who's remains were never found from American 77 were that of 3 year old Dana Falkenberg, who was obviously so small that there was nothing left of her to claim.

2006-06-09 20:09:04 · update #4

The Empire State Building *was* in fact hit by a bomber, but it was in no way direct. A small bomber lost in the late fog during the 1940s *did* crash into the ESB. But, the airplane was smaller than a Boeing 757, and was going much slower.

http://www.evesmag.com/empirestatebldgcrash.jpg

Ernie Sisto nabbed this shot leaning precariously over the edge of the building in 1945!

2006-06-09 20:14:30 · update #5

The Pearl Harbor conspiracy *may* have been correct, in a way. Germany had an alliance with Japan, which mean if Japan were ever attacked, it would come to the aid of Japan. This is mostly the reason why we cut off our oil exportation to Japan, which stopped it's entire industry, and basically put a choke hold on Japanese economy. They became so very constrained and desperate for oil, they formally told FDR in writing that they would attack us in one way or another. FDR Did not want another mess of troop enemies in the pacific, as he was ready to come to the aid of the allies in Europe, AND a new war would bring america out of the depression with tons of new jobs, and everything would be milk and honey. And subsequently, on December 7th 1941 we were attacked by Japan for the first but not last time. The only other time Japan attacked United States soil was when they released a bomb attached to a baloon into the jet stream, it landed and exploded, killing a family of picnicers.

2006-06-10 04:16:31 · update #6

10 answers

Why is it that anyone could believe any of the conspiracy theories out there? I get that people here aren't structural engineers, but let me give you an example... Did you know that a bulletproof vest capable of stopping the largest pistol rounds you could stab a knife right through? That a fast moving small round like a 22 is more likely to penetrate than a slow moving big round like a 45? The science on the building failures & fire progression is excellent & very understandable.

As to some CIA conspiracy… you know most CIA employees are democrats? And even so, there is no way they’d allow an attack on Americans for political reasons. That’s insane! Not to mention what political gain came from the 9/11? If the President wanted to attack Bin Laden, there had been an attack on the USS Cole just months before he took office. Iraq you think? We justified that with WMD violations of UN sanctions, and the world didn’t follow us in there even with 9/11. We could have done the same thing if 9/11 had never occurred.

You can disagree with what the President has done since 9/11, but if you think he needed that horrific attack to justify the military action we’ve taken since then, you’re wrong. I also love how the same people that say Bush conducted this insanely complicated plot, are also the ones that say he is dumber than a rock. Wouldn’t he have to be an evil genius far smarter than any of us? There were theories back in WWII that FDR (a democrat) knew in advance & allowed the attack on Pearl Harbor so he could take us into the war, or more sinisterly so the military industrial complex could get rich putting Americans to work after a depression. That was stupid & insulting to the people who died then, just as these conspiracies are stupid now. As long as people continue to be so disconnected from reality they’ll continue to hand elections to conservatives.

2006-06-09 20:40:49 · answer #1 · answered by djack 5 · 3 1

i believe the two towers were really hit. and the CIA knew about it but they let go for the political advantage that will result after wards and use it as an excuse to go to war against Iraq. i am still not convinced about the other two planes. They never showed on TV the aftermath ground such as pieces of the air plans or anything would lead that there are a real air plans that hit. BTW, the last video of the pentagon crash is still not clear.

2006-06-09 19:45:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The buildings were made to withstand temperatures of the melting temp of titanium and a direct hit from an aircraft. If those buildings fell the way you claim, they will be the 1st and 2nd in the history of the world!! Even the empire state building, much older than the trade center, was hit by bomber!

The fire never brought down those buildings. It was never hot enough! Titanium melts at 3,560 degrees F. Avaiation fuel burns at max 590 degreesF. It's total BS that fire of thet length brought those huildings down! There is nothing in that building that burns at 3,560 degrees F!!!!

No I believe their is a lot to the story that hasn't been told!

2006-06-09 19:42:14 · answer #3 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0 0

OK and what about the building No.7? the wonder woman invisible plane hit that building too? and what about the extreme heat in the pentagon, and don't melt the computer and books in the next office? Only in USA the heat destroy buildings.Open your eyes and don't be one more victim, I don't like the theory too but the freaking problem have a lot of black points.

2006-06-09 19:24:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Why would these idiots believe you? It is what it is. We have been attacked by the Islamic Jihad ragheads for years and President Bush and Our military are doing something about it and the Left know they should of responded to all the other attacks on Americans when Clinton was in office. It doesn't matter what the truth is, they are gonna listen to the appeasing democrats!

2006-06-10 01:05:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well said! Thank you for saying what is on my mind every time I read some of the stupid questions on here concerning 9/11. I firmly believe that the ones who do believe in the conspiracy theories are either too young to remember that day or they are the same idiots that think we never went to the moon.

2006-06-09 19:25:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There is regularly anybody who desires to believe smarter or greater than different men and women. So as a substitute of honestly finding out truly matters they opt for conspiracy theories. That method they may be able to appear at different men and women and feel "I recognize matters they do not know, I am smarter than them" Most of those conspiracy theories do not stack up towards the proof, mostly misquoting their resources. The modern-day appears to be a missile hitting the moment tower. as though the enormous quantities of witnesses would not have quite spotted.

2016-09-08 22:56:52 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Wow

2006-06-09 19:10:54 · answer #8 · answered by ag_iitkgp 7 · 0 0

I don't believe but the coincidence

2006-06-09 19:10:47 · answer #9 · answered by Rim 6 · 0 0

No.

2006-06-10 02:20:37 · answer #10 · answered by welcome_to_how_things_will_be 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers