You idiots (the geniuses replying to this question like morganton & lancelot) need to wake up. You talk of the fight for freedom, that has been reduced since the war began!! You talk of terrorist attacks and how there have been none since the war began, only in th eus though, they have increased elsewhere
You get your information from newspapers that support whatever suits them, you don't expect them to tell the truth do you?
You know nothing of the government in the middle east and judge it by your narrow standards.
The us invades a country then leaves a power vacuum when it withdraws resulting in chaos for the inhabitants. You are not doing the locals a favour when you invade, you leave a country in disarray in which there are several factions fighting for control.
You may not have liked saddam, but the country operated well when he was running it.
lancelot, morganton, pull your heads out of your @rses and have a look around, you might learn something.
2006-06-09 23:09:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Nemesis 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
The bloodthirsty ones want more blood. They will turn a blind eye on what's happening and mouth inane reasons to justify it.
Make no mistake - Repugs and a significant number of Dems tacitly approve. They have learned very little from 9/11. They still are convinced that America cannot do much wrong.
They reference the constitution as if its a bible - reasoning that foreign peoples with different cultures and social mores need to follow the policies in that documents - Arrogance to the nth degree!!!..
But the rest of the world is not as before, there are enemies where there were none.
pherdpherphle's you're SOOOOOOO RIGHT!!! These people are hopeless. He probably reads the republican controlled news. Where did they get the idea that Saddam or Be n Laden wanted to rule the world? That a new reason they came uo with. Those people never said that and the media never published that before 9/11
2006-06-10 02:06:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Can you name one international intelligence agency that said Saddam DIDN'T have weapons of mass destruction? The whole world was in agreement about the WMD's, even your billionaire friend Kerry. Documents and tape recordings captured by special OP's say that Russia transported them to Syria just before the invasion. If the war was fought over oil, why are the prices so high? Why didn't we take Kuwait's oil after we took control of that country? There has not been a single terrorist attack in the USA since the war on terror. Why did the terrorists attack Canada when they didn't send any troops to Iraq? Why did the terrorists blow up the WTC when Bill Clinton was president?
2006-06-10 05:03:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by MorgantonNC 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
The 50+ million people of Afghanistan and Iraq don't seem to agree with your hate mongering. The fanatical terrorists that first attacked us in 93, and have attacked many other countries as well, are attempting to enslave the entire world to their tyrannical will. This is a world wide war against terrorism going on in many countries. Ben Laden and the likes want world domination. The rest of us want democratic Peace, and thanks to the likes of Bush, we may live to see it. It took us 11 years to get our constitution and 14 to get our government seated. Thanks to the help of the 36 countries in the coalition, the Iraqi's got their constitution and government in just over three years.
2006-06-10 02:15:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dusty 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you hate what the troops are doing, why don't you go to Iraq and fight with the insurgents. I hear they are in dire need of a new leader. Don't be scared to stand up for what you believe in, the Americans surly aren't.
You really need to be more informed. The coalition forces have set up schools, hosptials, roads, electrical facilities, police forces, and armies, all in greater quanities than they had under Saddam. Do you really believe that the Iraqis were better off under Saddam? Get a clue!
2006-06-10 02:35:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Saddam killed more people with his gas attack on the kurds than the U.S. has, so shut the hell up.If it was about oil the gas prices in the U.S. would've have more than doubled either.We have'nt benifited a damn bit.How about all the people being murdered by the so called different religous factions in Iraq?Your country is raping itself when it has the chance to give freedom & prosperity to all.Terrorism has'nt spread it's just being exposed more now.Mabey the U.S. should've left Saddam in power,atleast he could control those idiots that are raping Iraq now.Either way alot of innocent people have died at the hands of fellow Iraqies.
2006-06-10 02:18:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Troy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
What innocent people! The kids know when and where the attacks are going to happen. The soldiers know when the kids disappear it's INCOMING!!!! The terrorist move form house to house to attack and plant bombs. We should surround every place that's a hot spot and drop fliers telling those that wish to surrender to walk out with your hands up. Those that chose to stay should get a MOAB(mother of all bombs) dropped right in their lap! A conventional bomb so big and bad it makes a nuke size blast without the radioactivity. This kind of action would kill all the terrorists real quick and end this panty waist BS that's going on now.
2006-06-10 16:36:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You know what? PREACH it baby!! (laughing) I don't know why people is always talking about immigrants savataging the "americans" if "americans" are savataging everyone else in the world that they can! The war that the americans brought to iraq was useless and only caused the deaths of a bunch of innocent people. I don't know how much proof they need but damn haha...it's funny the way "americans" do things.
2006-06-10 02:00:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Secret2Know 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
They only thing they will do is re-elect stupid Bush and and his shithead aides for another term. Surprisingly, as it may seem, many Americans oppose war in Iraq but they do not seem to get the message clear to Bush. Why else would he still be in power acting like a lost ape?
2006-06-10 02:00:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by kuts 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You mean atrocities like freeing them from a murderous dictator, bringing free elections to their country, giving the people of Iraq a means of determining their own future. Yeah those are really awful things we should really be ashamed of.
2006-06-10 02:01:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋