2006-06-09 17:27:09 · 8 answers · asked by kevman0713 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
The difference between art and pornography is the same as the difference between nudism and exhibitionism.
In art and nudism, your hands are available to clap. In porn and exhibitionism, what's the sound of one hand clapping?
The day nudity is immoral is the day we're born with clothes on. (I've lost count of how many stupid people have said, "But we are...!")
The only people who want to run around city streets naked are the sex obsessed. Nudists only take off their clothes where it's permitted and socially acceptable.
2006-06-09 17:49:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you happened to be made of stone and wanted to run around nude, people would be fine with it. There is actually constant debate on what qualifies as art and what qualifies as vulgar.
2006-06-10 00:29:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not everyone looks like Michaelangelo's David. Trust me, there are people you just don't want to see naked.
They're the same people who come up to me and say, "Do you know you're out of donut bags?"
Sheesh. How could anyone not know something like that!
2006-06-10 01:29:43 · answer #3 · answered by Diana 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because we don't want to sit where your naked @$$ has left a smear in the booth at our favorite restaurants.
2006-06-10 00:31:48 · answer #4 · answered by ŧťŠ4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
naked statues aren't real people. and have you seen a naked person running.........ugh
2006-06-10 00:30:02 · answer #5 · answered by ▒Яenée▒ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because,not all naked bodies are considered art,some are just considered gross.thank god for clothing!
2006-06-10 00:30:21 · answer #6 · answered by deerwoman777 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
can't say really. but i loved deerwoman's two cents worth. i would have said that too.
2006-06-10 00:32:34 · answer #7 · answered by NUCKING FUTS!!! 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cause people are stupid.
2006-06-10 00:29:49 · answer #8 · answered by Girl Goes Back To The Future 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋