English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Constitution should be amended to make it possible for popular leaders like Clinton to have a third term.

2006-06-09 16:35:31 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

I have been asked to say 1 thing that Pres. Clinton did, well, he was able to bring to a close the Irish problem that had been intractable until then. His charisma alone was sufficient for sworn enemies of hundreds of years to put aside their differences and to start talking. Now how would a President, who had never been further than Mexico before his presidency, have coped with such a problem?

2006-06-09 17:47:29 · update #1

19 answers

No, George War Bush is a true friend. He is repaying his debt to all his sponsors by buying weapons with your tax money to fight different wars... McDonnel Douglas and Boeing think he is a man of his word

2006-06-09 16:39:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

President Bush (let's not be disrespectful) is a great president, but no , I think two terms is enough for any man, it's a tough job. I disagree with you about President Clinton, he was a great politician, but a lousy president, and his popularity is no where near as great as you think. Tell us what it was exactly that he did while in office, besides make you like him? He took credit for an economy that was on the up swing when he took office, he has , at the very least, questionable morals, he did little to address the issue of terrorists, and the list goes on.

2006-06-10 00:11:03 · answer #2 · answered by rosi l 5 · 0 0

Yes, I would support GWB. I do support him. Why would anybody want such an immoral person like Bill Clinton for a 3rd term? He has the morals of an alley cat. The man has no respect for his wife, his child and the White House to do the things he did.

2006-06-09 23:39:54 · answer #3 · answered by Caleb's Mom 6 · 0 0

Bush isn't perfect but a liberal would have surrendered.And the only thing Clinton did good was taking credit for the economy after the conservative congress did all the work.
And without term limits we could easily wind up with a dictator who fixes elections.

2006-06-09 23:46:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The indispen must be a moron. GWB has already been elected a 2nd time. Anyway, I voted for Bush twice. Given the opportunity to do it over, with the same opponents, I would support him again both times. I would never vote for a liberal democrat under any circumstances.

2006-06-09 23:41:54 · answer #5 · answered by The Infidel 4 · 0 0

Yeah Bush!!!


Boooooo Clinton.

2006-06-09 23:38:02 · answer #6 · answered by Huevos Rancheros 6 · 0 0

Yeah I would. Especially since the best opponent that was available was John Kerry. I wanted a president that was going to see this war through to success and completion. I was just mentioning tonight how afraid I would have been for our safety at home and for our troops if Kerry was elected.

Also my boyfriend was in training at Fort Drum for his Iraq deployment at the time of the election. He told me that it was a general consensus between him and his fellow soldiers that their lives would be in greater jeopardy over there if Kerry was elected.

2006-06-09 23:42:23 · answer #7 · answered by prettyinpunkk 4 · 0 0

I decline to actually state wether or not a third term is a viable solution...I do agree that Bush is a serious threat to common human freedoms....I beleive that this fool will try to amend the constitution away....I beleive if your human than you should have human rights & i think that the sociopolitical moves based on a relegous agenda will destroy the country that our fore fathers intended us to have.

2006-06-09 23:42:09 · answer #8 · answered by blackpualani 2 · 0 0

Clinton is an amoral liar! thank God he did not get a third term. things that are popular are not always good, check out pop culture for many examples.

2006-06-09 23:39:10 · answer #9 · answered by dleeldy 3 · 0 0

well the candidates that bush was up against werent so great either. and i definately wouldnt put clinton back in office, what did he do that was so great? nothing. but if bush was able to run again i would not vote for him, he lost my support.

2006-06-09 23:42:19 · answer #10 · answered by krystal 6 · 0 0

Yes

2006-06-09 23:38:48 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers